Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories.Edwin Williams - 1983 - Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (3):423 - 446.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • The syntax of predication.John Bowers - 1993 - Linguistic Inquiry 24:591--656.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • (1 other version)Learning to express motion events in English and korean : The influence of language specific lexicalization patterns.Soonja Choi & Melissa Bowerman - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & conceptual semantics. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell. pp. 83-121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • On concept and object.Gottlob Frege - 1951 - Mind 60 (238):168-180.
    Translation of Frege's 'Über Begriff und Gegenstand' (1892). Translation by Peter Geach, revised by Max Black.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   204 citations  
  • The algebra of events.Emmon Bach - 1986 - Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (1):5--16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   140 citations  
  • (1 other version)Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns.Soonja Choi & Melissa Bowerman - 1991 - Cognition 41 (1-3):83-121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Learning to divide the labor: an account of deficits in light and heavy verb production.Jean K. Gordon & Gary S. Dell - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (1):1-40.
    Theories of sentence production that involve a convergence of activation from conceptual‐semantic and syntactic‐sequential units inspired a connectionist model that was trained to produce simple sentences. The model used a learning algorithm that resulted in a sharing of responsibility (or “division of labor”) between syntactic and semantic inputs for lexical activation according to their predictive power. Semantically rich, or “heavy”, verbs in the model came to rely on semantic cues more than on syntactic cues, whereas semantically impoverished, or “light”, verbs (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • (1 other version)On semantics.James Higginbotham - 1985 - Linguistic Inquiry 16:547--593.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   141 citations  
  • Sentence comprehension and the left inferior frontal gyrus: Storage, not computation.Laurie A. Stowe - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):51-51.
    Neuroimaging evidence suggests that the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) supports temporary storage of linguistic material during linguistic tasks rather than computing a syntactic representation. The LIFG is not activated by simple sentences but by complex sentences and maintenance of word lists. Under this hypothesis, agrammatism should only disturb comprehension for constructions in which storage is essential.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics.Marcia C. Linebarger, Myrna F. Schwartz & Eleanor M. Saffran - 1983 - Cognition 13 (3):361-392.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis.Rita Sloan Berndt, Charlotte C. Mitchum & Anne N. Haendiges - 1996 - Cognition 58 (3):289-308.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition.Barbara Landau & Ray Jackendoff - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):217-238.
    Fundamental to spatial knowledge in all species are the representations underlying object recognition, object search, and navigation through space. But what sets humans apart from other species is our ability to express spatial experience through language. This target article explores the language ofobjectsandplaces, asking what geometric properties are preserved in the representations underlying object nouns and spatial prepositions in English. Evidence from these two aspects of language suggests there are significant differences in the geometric richness with which objects and places (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   101 citations  
  • Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension.N. F. Dronkers, D. P. Wilkins, R. D. Valin, B. B. Redfern & J. J. Jaeger - 2003 - Cognition 92 (1-2):145-177.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.David Caplan & Gloria S. Waters - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):77-94.
    This target article discusses the verbal working memory system used in sentence comprehension. We review the concept of working memory as a short-duration system in which small amounts of information are simultaneously stored and manipulated in the service of accomplishing a task. We summarize the argument that syntactic processing in sentence comprehension requires such a storage and computational system. We then ask whether the working memory system used in syntactic processing is the same as that used in verbally mediated tasks (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension.Nina F. Dronkers, David P. Wilkins, Robert D. Van Valin, Brenda B. Redfern & Jeri J. Jaeger - 2004 - Cognition 92 (1-2):145-177.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.Maryellen C. MacDonald, Neal J. Pearlmutter & Mark S. Seidenberg - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (4):676-703.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   185 citations  
  • The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages.Ina Bornkessel & Matthias Schlesewsky - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (4):787-821.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations