Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Foundations of Scientific Inference.Wesley C. Salmon - 1967 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Pre.
    Not since Ernest Nagel’s 1939 monograph on the theory of probability has there been a comprehensive elementary survey of the philosophical problems of probablity and induction. This is an authoritative and up-to-date treatment of the subject, and yet it is relatively brief and nontechnical. Hume’s skeptical arguments regarding the justification of induction are taken as a point of departure, and a variety of traditional and contemporary ways of dealing with this problem are considered. The author then sets forth his own (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   204 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Theory and Evidence.Clark Glymour - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):314-318.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   141 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   691 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.Lakatos Imre - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-195.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   251 citations  
  • Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   107 citations  
  • Logical versus historical theories of confirmation.Alan Musgrave - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   107 citations  
  • Campbell and Vinci on novel confirmation.Jeremiah E. McCarthy - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):216-220.
    Richmond Campbell and Thomas Vinci have recently presented a Bayesian theory of confirmation by novel evidence (Campbell and Vinci [1983]). I shall review their theory as briefly as possible and present three objections to it.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Some problems for bayesian confirmation theory.Charles S. Chihara - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):551-560.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • The career of continental drift theory: An application of Imre Lakatos' analysis of scientific growth to the rise of drift theory.Henry Frankel - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (1):21-66.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Why Are Novel Predictions Important?Richmond Campbell - 1982 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63 (2):111-121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Theory and Evidence.Clark N. Glymour - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
    The Description for this book, Theory and Evidence, will be forthcoming.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   372 citations  
  • Bayesianism and support by novel facts.Colin Howson - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):245-251.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • Another Look at Novel Facts.Nancey Murphy - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (3):385.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Some recent objections to the bayesian theory of support.Colin Howson - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):305-309.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Novel facts and bayesianism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):375-379.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Novelty And Confirmation.Michael Redhead - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):115-118.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   159 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Theory and Evidence.Clark Glymour - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):613-615.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   201 citations  
  • Novel confirmation.Richmond Campbell & Thomas Vinci - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):315-341.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Novel facts, Bayesian rationality, and the history of continental drift.Richard Nunan - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (4):267-307.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • (1 other version)Ad hocness and the appraisal of theories.Michael Redhead - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):355-361.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Predicting novel facts.Michael R. Gardner - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):1-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations