Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Natural language and natural selection.Steven Pinker & Paul Bloom - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):707-27.
    Many people have argued that the evolution of the human language faculty cannot be explained by Darwinian natural selection. Chomsky and Gould have suggested that language may have evolved as the by-product of selection for other abilities or as a consequence of as-yet unknown laws of growth and form. Others have argued that a biological specialization for grammar is incompatible with every tenet of Darwinian theory – that it shows no genetic variation, could not exist in any intermediate forms, confers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   610 citations  
  • Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions.H. Paul Grice - 1969 - Philosophical Review 78 (2):147-177.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   295 citations  
  • Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.Roger Levy - 2008 - Cognition 106 (3):1126-1177.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   210 citations  
  • Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.Gerry T. M. Altmann & Yuki Kamide - 1999 - Cognition 73 (3):247-264.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   187 citations  
  • A Mathematical Theory of Communication.Claude Elwood Shannon - 1948 - Bell System Technical Journal 27 (April 1924):379–423.
    The mathematical theory of communication.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1238 citations  
  • Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.Edward Gibson - 1998 - Cognition 68 (1):1-76.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   163 citations  
  • Interaction with context during human sentence processing.Gerry Altmann & Mark Steedman - 1988 - Cognition 30 (3):191-238.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   92 citations  
  • Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.Julie C. Sedivy, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Craig G. Chambers & Gregory N. Carlson - 1999 - Cognition 71 (2):109-147.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  • A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation.Daniel Jurafsky - 1996 - Cognitive Science 20 (2):137-194.
    The problems of access—retrieving linguistic structure from some mental grammar —and disambiguation—choosing among these structures to correctly parse ambiguous linguistic input—are fundamental to language understanding. The literature abounds with psychological results on lexical access, the access of idioms, syntactic rule access, parsing preferences, syntactic disambiguation, and the processing of garden‐path sentences. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to combine models which account for these results to build a general, uniform model of access and disambiguation at the lexical, idiomatic, and syntactic levels. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.Tessa Warren & Edward Gibson - 2002 - Cognition 85 (1):79-112.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language.E. KaisEr & J. Trueswell - 2004 - Cognition 94 (2):113-147.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?Victor S. Ferreira, L. Robert Slevc & Erin S. Rogers - 2005 - Cognition 96 (3):263-284.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.Jeanette Gundel, Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski - 1993 - Language 69:274--307.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   107 citations  
  • Zipf's Law and Avoidance of Excessive Synonymy.Dmitrii Y. Manin - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (7):1075-1098.
    Zipf's law states that if words of language are ranked in the order of decreasing frequency in texts, the frequency of a word is inversely proportional to its rank. It is very reliably observed in the data, but to date it escaped satisfactory theoretical explanation. This article suggests that Zipf's law may result from a hierarchical organization of word meanings over the semantic space, which in turn is generated by the evolution of word semantics dominated by expansion of meanings and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences.Douglas Roland, Jeffrey L. Elman & Victor S. Ferreira - 2006 - Cognition 98 (3):245-272.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension.Daniel Grodner, Edward Gibson & Duane Watson - 2005 - Cognition 95 (3):275-296.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations