Switch to: Citations

References in:

Self-defeating arguments

Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392 (1991)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Causation.Yoav Shoham - 1990 - Cognitive Science 14 (2):213-252.
    It is suggested that taking into account considerations that traditionally fall within the scope of computer science in general, and artificial intelligence in particular, sheds new light on the subject of causation. It is argued that adopting causal notions con be viewed as filling a computational need: They allow reasoning with incomplete information, facilitate economical representations, and afford relatively efficient methods for reasoning about those representations. Specifically, it is proposed that causal reasoning is intimately bound to nonmonotonic reasoning. An account (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Nomic Probability and the Foundations of Induction.John L. Pollock - 1990 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
    In this book Pollock deals with the subject of probabilistic reasoning, making general philosophical sense of objective probabilities and exploring their ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   88 citations  
  • Knowledge and Justification.John L. Pollock - 1974 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by John Pollock.
    Princeton University Press, 1974. This book is out of print, but can be downloaded as a pdf file (5 MB).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   181 citations  
  • How to reason defeasibly.John L. Pollock - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 57 (1):1-42.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   60 citations  
  • Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
    There was a long tradition in philosophy according to which good reasoning had to be deductively valid. However, that tradition began to be questioned in the 1960’s, and is now thoroughly discredited. What caused its downfall was the recognition that many familiar kinds of reasoning are not deductively valid, but clearly confer justification on their conclusions. Here are some simple examples.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   337 citations  
  • Contemporary theories of knowledge.John L. Pollock - 1986 - London: Hutchinson.
    This new edition of the classic Contemporary Theories of Knowledge has been significantly updated to include analyses of the recent literature in epistemology.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   539 citations  
  • ``The Paradox of the Preface".D. C. Makinson - 1964 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   251 citations  
  • The paradox of the preface.David C. Makinson - 1965 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
    By means of an example, shows the possibility of beliefs that are separately rational whilst together inconsistent.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   253 citations  
  • Probability and the logic of rational belief.Henry Ely Kyburg - 1961 - Middletown, Conn.,: Wesleyan University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   276 citations  
  • Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief.Henry Ely Kyburg - 1961 - Middletown, CT, USA: Wesleyan University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   322 citations  
  • ``Conjunctivitis".Henry E. Kyburg Jr - 1970 - In Marshall Swain (ed.), Induction, acceptance, and rational belief. Dordrecht,: Reidel. pp. 55-82.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations