Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Elusive Knowledge.David Lewis - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   440 citations  
  • The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William L. Rowe - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):335 - 341.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   258 citations  
  • 19 The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William Rowe - 1979 - In Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Blackwell. pp. 6--157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   165 citations  
  • A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification.David B. Annis - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (3):213 - 219.
    David Annis is professor of philosophy at Ball State University. In this essay, Annis offers an alternative to the foundationalist-coherent controversy: "contextualism." This theory rejects both the idea of intrinsically basic beliefs in the foundational sense and the thesis that coherence is sufficient for justification. he argues that justification is relative to the varying norms of social practices.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   86 citations  
  • Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism.Peter Unger - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (194):489-490.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   295 citations  
  • Philosophical relativity.Peter Unger - 1985 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 175 (1):103-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • The Classical Decision Problem.Egon Börger, Erich Grädel & Yuri Gurevich - 2000 - Studia Logica 64 (1):140-143.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • Learning Theory and Descriptive Set Theory.Kevin T. Kelly - unknown
    then essentially characterized the hypotheses that mechanical scientists can successfully decide in the limit in terms of arithmetic complexity. These ideas were developed still further by Peter Kugel [4]. In this paper, I extend this approach to obtain characterizations of identification in the limit, identification with bounded mind-changes, and identification in the short run, both for computers and for ideal agents with unbounded computational abilities. The characterization of identification with n mind-changes entails, as a corollary, an exact arithmetic characterization of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations