Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Are doctors altruistic?W. Glannon - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):68-69.
    There is a growing belief in the US that medicine is an altruistic profession, and that physicians display altruism in their daily work. We argue that one of the most fundamental features of medical professionalism is a fiduciary responsibility to patients, which implies a duty or obligation to act in patients' best medical interests. The term that best captures this sense of obligation is “beneficence”, which contrasts with “altruism” because the latter act is supererogatory and is beyond obligation. On the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Do doctors owe a special duty of beneficence to their patients?R. Gillon - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (4):171-173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Professions as the conscience of society.Paul Sieghart - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (3):117-122.
    Ethics is no less of a science than any other. It has its roots in conflicts of interest between human beings, and in their conflicting urges to behave either selfishly or altruistically. Resolving such conflicts leads to the specification of rules of conduct, often expressed in terms of rights and duties. In the special case of professional ethics, the paramount rule of conduct is altruism in the service of a 'noble' cause, and this distinguishes true professions from other trades or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Professional ethics: further comments.Robin S. Downie - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (4):195-196.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Supererogation and the profession of medicine.A. C. McKay - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):70-73.
    In the light of increasing public mistrust, there is an urgent need to clarify the moral status of the medical profession and of the relationship of the clinician to his/her patients. In addressing this question, I first establish the coherence, within moral philosophy generally, of the concept of supererogation . I adopt the notion of an act of “unqualified” supererogation as one that is non-derivatively good, praiseworthy, and freely undertaken for others' benefit at the risk of some cost to the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations