Switch to: Citations

References in:

Booknotes 15.3

Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):465-473 (2000)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Function and teleology.Morton Beckner - 1969 - Journal of the History of Biology 2 (1):151-164.
    The view of teleology sketched in the above remarks seems to me to offer a piece of candy to both the critics and guardians of teleology. The critics want to defend against a number of things: the importation of unverifiable theological or metaphysical doctrines into the sciences; the idea that goals somehow act in favor of their won realization; and the view that biological systems require for their study concepts and patterns of explanation unlike anything employed in the physical sciences. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   883 citations  
  • Philosophy of Natural Science.Carl G. Hempel - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):70-72.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   587 citations  
  • The Ascent of Life.T. A. Goudje - 1975 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 31 (1):112-112.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   64 citations  
  • (1 other version)Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology.Elliott Sober (ed.) - 1994 - The Mit Press. Bradford Books.
    Changes and additions in the new edition reflect the ways in which the subject has broadened and deepened on several fronts; more than half of the-chapters are ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations  
  • Philosophy of Biology. [REVIEW]Michael Ruse - 1998 - International Studies in Philosophy 30 (4):150-151.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations  
  • Commentary?Part I.Ernst Mayr & Ernest Nagel - 1969 - Journal of the History of Biology 2 (1):123-147.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Two evolutionary theories (II).Marjorie Grene - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (35):185-193.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Two evolutionary theories (1).Marjorie Grene - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (34):110-127.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Mind 72 (287):429-441.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   293 citations  
  • The Structure of Biological Theories.Paul Thompson - 1989 - State University of New York Press.
    The central thesis of this book is that the semantic conception is a logical methodologically and heuristically richer and more accurate account of scientific theorizing, and in particular of theorizing in evolutionary biology, than the ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  • What’s Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?John Beatty - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
    Much if not most recent literature in philosophy of biology concerns the extent to which biological theories conform to what is known as the "received" philosophical view of scientific theories, a descendant of the logical-empiricist view of theories. But the received view currently faces a competitor--a very different view of theories known as the "semantic" view. It is argued here that the semantic view is more sensitive to the nature and limitations of evolutionary theory than is the received view. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.Ernest Nagel - 1981 - Science and Society 45 (4):475-480.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   200 citations