Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology. By Richard C. Tolman. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1934. Pp. XV + 502. $8.50.Enos E. Witmer - 1935 - Philosophy of Science 2 (2):262-265.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Conjunctive forks and temporally asymmetric inference.Elliott Sober & Martin Barrett - 1992 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1):1 – 23.
    We argue against some of Reichenbach's claims about causal forks are incorrect. We do not see why the Second Law of Thermodynamics rules out the existence of conjunctive forks open to the past. In addition, we argue that a common effect rarely forms a conjunctive fork with its joint causes, but it sometimes does. Nevertheless, we think there is something to be said for Reichenbach's idea that forks of various kinds are relevant to explaining why we know more about the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Lawrence Sklar. Space, time and spacetime. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974. xii + 423 pp.Robert Weingard - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):167-173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • The Direction of Time.Milic Capek - 1959 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 19 (3):402-405.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  • Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy. [REVIEW]A. E. M. & C. D. Broad - 1938 - Journal of Philosophy 35 (18):491.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • Foundations of Space-Time Theories.Michael Friedman - 1987 - Noûs 21 (4):595-601.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   244 citations  
  • The Nature of Existence.J. M. E. Mctaggart - 1922 - Journal of Philosophy 19 (18):497-500.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • An attempt to add a little direction to "the problem of the direction of time".John Earman - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (1):15-47.
    It is argued that the main problem with "the problem of the direction of time" is to figure out what the problem is or is supposed to be. Towards this end, an attempt is made to disentangle and to classify some of the many issues which have been discussed under the label of 'the direction of time'. Secondly, some technical apparatus is introduced in the hope of producing a sharper formulation of the issues than they have received in the philosophical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • Space, time, and spacetime.L. Sklar - 1976 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 172 (3):545-555.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   170 citations  
  • The Nature of Existence.John Mctaggart, Ellis Mctaggart & C. D. Broad - 1928 - Mind 37 (146):221-233.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   83 citations  
  • Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy.C. D. Broad - 1939 - Mind 48 (192):502-517.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time.John S. Earman - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):129-136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Tachyon Signals, Causal Paradoxes, and the Relativity of Simultaneity.Steven F. Savitt - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:277 - 292.
    Some elementary properties of tachyons are described and then it is argued that the claim that (T) Tachyons exist, is incompatible with the truth of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR). First it is argued that from T, STR, and the negation of the principle that (Pl) Effect never precedes cause, one can derive a paradoxical conclusion, one of the so-called "causal paradoxes". An obvious response is to affirm (Pl), but then it is argued that (Pl) and (T) entail that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations