Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing?Eric T. Juengst - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (3):15-23.
    In 2015, a flourish of “alarums and excursions” by the scientific community propelled CRISPR/Cas9 and other new gene-editing techniques into public attention. At issue were two kinds of potential gene-editing experiments in humans: those making inheritable germ-line modifications and those designed to enhance human traits beyond what is necessary for health and healing. The scientific consensus seemed to be that while research to develop safe and effective human gene editing should continue, society's moral uncertainties about these two kinds of experiments (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Genome Editing and Human Reproduction.Nuffield Council on Bioethics - 2019 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 24 (1):255-322.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Imperatives of Governance: Human Genome Editing and the Problem of Progress.J. Benjamin Hurlbut - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):177-194.
    The ability to make direct genetic changes to the DNA of future children poses profound challenges for governance: should it be done? For what purposes and subject to what limitations? And, no less importantly, who should decide? As a resolution pending in the US Senate rightly states, the prospect of editing the germline "touches on all of humanity". Given this, how should we as a human community guide and govern this emerging technology?The question of how human genome editing should be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Ethics, speculation, and values.Rebecca Roache - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):317-327.
    Some writers claim that ethicists involved in assessing future technologies like nanotechnology and human enhancement devote too much time to debating issues that may or may not arise, at the expense of addressing more urgent, current issues. This practice has been claimed to squander the scarce and valuable resource of ethical concern. I assess this view, and consider some alternatives to ‘speculative ethics’ that have been put forward. I argue that attempting to restrict ethical debate so as to avoid considering (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):31-46.
    Most known technology serves to ingeniously adapt the world to the physical and mental limitations of human beings. Humankind has acquired awesome power with its rather limited means. Nanotechnological capabilities further this power. On some accounts, however, nanotechnological research will contribute to a rather different kind of technological development, namely one that changes human beings so as to remove or reduce their physical and mental limitations. The prospect of this technological development has inspired a fair amount of ethical debate. Here, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   108 citations  
  • A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century.Kyle B. Brothers, Suzanne M. Rivera, R. Jean Cadigan, Richard R. Sharp & Aaron J. Goldenberg - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1):165-172.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The value and pitfalls of speculation about science and technology in bioethics: the case of cognitive enhancement.Eric Racine, Tristana Martin Rubio, Jennifer Chandler, Cynthia Forlini & Jayne Lucke - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3):325-337.
    In the debate on the ethics of the non-medical use of pharmaceuticals for cognitive performance enhancement in healthy individuals there is a clear division between those who view “cognitive enhancement” as ethically unproblematic and those who see such practices as fraught with ethical problems. Yet another, more subtle issue, relates to the relevance and quality of the contribution of scholarly bioethics to this debate. More specifically, how have various forms of speculation, anticipatory ethics, and methods to predict scientific trends and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • How Ethics Can Better Anticipate the Consequences of Emerging Biotechnologies.Dorit Barlevy & Christopher Thomas Scott - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (1):46-48.
    Ankeny et al.’s “Developing a Reflexive, Anticipatory, and Deliberative Approach to Unanticipated Discoveries: Ethical Lessons from iBlastoids” cites several places in the lite...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Slouching Toward Policy: Lazy Bioethics and the Perils of Science Fiction.Ruth Levy Guyer & Jonathan D. Moreno - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):W14-W17.
    Too much contemporary bioethical discourse is weak on science, lazily citing and adopting science fiction scenarios rather than science facts in the framing of analyses and policies. We challenge bioethicists to take more seriously the role of providing informed insight into and oversight over contemporary science and its implications and applications. Bioethicists must work harder to understand the fast-changing truths and limits of basic science, and they must incorporate only appropriate and authentic science into their discourse, just as they did (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Developing a Reflexive, Anticipatory, and Deliberative Approach to Unanticipated Discoveries: Ethical Lessons from iBlastoids”.Joan Leach, Megan J. Munsie & Rachel A. Ankeny - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (2):W1-W3.
    In “Developing a Reflexive, Anticipatory, and Deliberative Approach to Unanticipated Discoveries: Ethical Lessons from iBlastoids,” we proposed a RAD approach to meet the challenging issues...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What to Expect When Expecting CRISPR Baby Number Four.Cynthia Selin & Christopher Thomas Scott - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):7-9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations