Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)A very weak square principle.Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (1):175-196.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals.Saharon Shelah - 1991 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (1):25-53.
    REF is the statement that every stationary subset of a cardinal reflects, unless it fails to do so for a trivial reason. The main theorem, presented in Sect. 0, is that under suitable assumptions it is consistent that REF and there is a κ which is κ+n -supercompact. The main concepts defined in Sect. 1 are PT, which is a certain statement about the existence of transversals, and the “bad” stationary set. It is shown that supercompactness (and even the failure (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • If there is an exactly λ-free Abelian group then there is an exactly λ-separable one in λ.Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (4):1261-1278.
    We give a solution stated in the title to problem 3 of part 1 of the problems listed in the book of Eklof and Mekler [2], p. 453. There, in pp. 241-242, this is discussed and proved in some cases. The existence of strongly λ-free ones was proved earlier by the criteria in [5] and [3]. We can apply a similar proof to a large class of other varieties in particular to the variety of (non-commutative) groups.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Incompactness in regular cardinals.Saharon Shelah - 1985 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (3):195-228.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Undefinability of κ-well-orderings in l∞κ.Juha Oikkonen - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (3):999 - 1020.
    We prove that the class of trees with no branches of cardinality ≥κ is not RPC definable in L ∞κ when κ is regular. Earlier such a result was known for L κ + κ under the assumption $\kappa^{ . Our main result is actually proved in a stronger form which covers also L ∞λ (and makes sense there) for every strong limit cardinal $\lambda > \kappa$ of cofinality κ.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations