Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Why counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism are incompatible.J. Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):24-27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Why counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism are incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):329-333.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Why Counterpart Theory and Three-Dimensionalism are Incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):24-27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • On The Plurality of Worlds.Graeme Forbes - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (151):222-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   514 citations  
  • Three-dimensionalism and counterpart theory.Simon Langford - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):321-325.
    Jim Stone argues that one cannot combine three-dimensionalism with counterpart theory. This paper argues to the contrary.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Contingent identity.Allan Gibbard - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (2):187-222.
    Identities formed with proper names may be contingent. this claim is made first through an example. the paper then develops a theory of the semantics of concrete things, with contingent identity as a consequence. this general theory lets concrete things be made up canonically from fundamental physical entities. it includes theories of proper names, variables, cross-world identity with respect to a sortal, and modal and dispositional properties. the theory, it is argued, is coherent and superior to its rivals, in that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   285 citations  
  • On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2666 citations