Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The insolubility proof of the quantum measurement problem.Harvey R. Brown - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (9):857-870.
    Modern insolubility proofs of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics not only differ in their complexity and degree of generality, but also reveal a lack of agreement concerning the fundamental question of what constitutes such a proof. A systematic reworking of the (incomplete) 1970 Fine theorem is presented, which is intended to go some way toward clarifying the issue.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • The measurement problem: Some “solutions”.David Z. Albert & Barry Loewer - 1991 - Synthese 86 (1):87 - 98.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science.Werner Heisenberg - 1958 - New York: Harper.
    The seminal work by one of the most important thinkers of the twentieth century, Physics and Philosophy is Werner Heisenberg's concise and accessible narrative of the revolution in modern physics, in which he played a towering role. The outgrowth of a celebrated lecture series, this book remains as relevant, provocative, and fascinating as when it was first published in 1958. A brilliant scientist whose ideas altered our perception of the universe, Heisenberg is considered the father of quantum physics; he is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   278 citations  
  • .Jeremy Butterfield & John Earman - 1977
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   365 citations  
  • Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View.Paul Teller & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (3):457.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   183 citations  
  • On quantum propensities: Two arguments revisited.Mauricio Suárez - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (1):1-16.
    Peter Milne and Neal Grossman have argued against Popper's propensity interpretation of quantum mechanics, by appeal to the two-slit experiment and to the distinction between mixtures and superpositions, respectively. In this paper I show that a different propensity interpretation successfully meets their objections. According to this interpretation, the possession of a quantum propensity by a quantum system is independent of the experimental set-ups designed to test it, even though its manifestations are not.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Dispositions. [REVIEW]D. Stoljar - 2005 - Mind 114 (453):178-180.
    This is a review of Mumford's *Dispositions*.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • A note on Popper, propensities, and the two-slit experiment.Peter Milne - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):66-70.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The semantics and ontology of dispositions.D. H. Mellor - 2000 - Mind 109 (436):757--780.
    The paper looks at the semantics and ontology of dispositions in the light of recent work on the subject. Objections to the simple conditionals apparently entailed by disposition statements are met by replacing them with so-called 'reduction sentences' and some implications of this are explored. The usual distinction between categorical and dispositional properties is criticised and the relation between dispositions and their bases examined. Applying this discussion to two typical cases leads to the conclusion that fragility is not a real (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   69 citations  
  • Dispositions and conditionals.C. B. Martin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (174):1-8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   390 citations  
  • The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1989 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    R.I.G Hughes offers the first detailed and accessible analysis of the Hilbert-space models used in quantum theory and explains why they are so successful.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   138 citations  
  • Quantum mechanics and interpretations of probability theory.Neal Grossman - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (4):451-460.
    Several philosophers of science have claimed that the conceptual difficulties of quantum mechanics can be resolved by appealing to a particular interpretation of probability theory. For example, Popper bases his treatment of quantum mechanics on the propensity interpretation of probability, and Margenau bases his treatment of quantum mechanics on the frequency interpretation of probability. The purpose of this paper is (i) to consider and reject such claims, and (ii) to discuss the question of whether the ψ -function refers to an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Probability and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.Arthur Fine - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1-37.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Quantum theory and the schism in physics.Karl Raimund Popper - 1982 - New York: Routledge.
    The basic theme of Popper's philosophy--that something can come from nothing--is related to the present situation in physical theory. Popper carries his investigation right to the center of current debate in quantum physics. He proposes an interpretation of physics--and indeed an entire cosmology--which is realist, conjectural, deductivist and objectivist, anti-positivist, and anti-instrumentalist. He stresses understanding, reminding us that our ignorance grows faster than our conjectural knowledge.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   118 citations  
  • The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Dennis Dieks & Pieter Vermaas - 1998 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    According to the modal interpretation, the standard mathematical framework of quantum mechanics specifies the physical magnitudes of a system, which have definite values. Probabilities are assigned to the possible values that these magnitudes may adopt. The interpretation is thus concerned with physical properties rather than with measurement results: it is a realistic interpretation. One of the notable achievements of this interpretation is that it dissolves the notorious measurement problem. The papers collected here, together with the introduction and concluding critical appraisal, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • Dispositions.Stephen Mumford - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
    Stephen Mumford puts forward a new theory of dispositions, showing how central their role is in metaphysics and philosophy of science. Much of our understanding of the physical and psychological world is expressed in terms of dispositional properties--from the solubility of sugar to the belief that zebras have stripes. Mumford discusses what it means to say that something has a property of this kind, and how dispositions can possibly be real things in the world. His clear, straightforward, realist account reveals (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   236 citations  
  • The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation.Richard Healey - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    This is one of the most important books on quantum mechanics to have appeared in recent years. It offers a dramatically new interpretation that resolves puzzles and paradoxes associated with the measurement problem and the behavior of coupled systems. A crucial feature of this interpretation is that a quantum mechanical measurement can be certain to have a particular outcome even when the observed system fails to have the property corresponding to that outcome just prior to the measurement interaction.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  • With complacency or concern: Solving the quantum measurement problem.Arthur Fine - 1987 - In P. Achinstein & R. Kagon (eds.), Kelvin's Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics. MIT Press. pp. 491--505.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • A note on measurement.John Earman & A. Shimony - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Measurement and quantum silence.Arthur Fine - 1993 - In S. French & H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 279--294.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dispositions.Stephen Mumford - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (1):193-197.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   222 citations  
  • The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1992 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (4):735-736.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   123 citations  
  • The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes, James T. Cushing & Ernan Mcmullin - 1991 - Synthese 86 (1):99-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   80 citations  
  • Search for a Naturalistic World View.Abner Shimony - 1997 - Synthese 110 (2):335-342.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations