Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. What is the Point of Equality?Elizabeth S. Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   469 citations  
  • Equality of What?Amartya Sen - 1987 - In John Rawls & Sterling M. McMurrin (eds.), Liberty, Equality, and Law: Selected Tanner Lectures on Moral Philosophy. University of Utah Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   60 citations  
  • On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.G. A. Cohen - 1989 - Ethics 99 (4):906-944.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   415 citations  
  • Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.Charles Taylor - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):3-51.
    Interpretation, in the sense relevant to hermeneutics, is an attempt to make clear, to make sense of an object of study. This object must, therefore, be a text or a text-analogue, which in some way is confused, incomplete, cloudy, seemingly contradictory--in one way or another, unclear. The interpretation aims to bring to light an underlying coherence or sense.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.G. A. Cohen - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3-30.
    The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   82 citations  
  • Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism.Richard J. Arneson - 2000 - Ethics 110 (2):339-349.
    In her recent, provocative essay “What Is the Point of Equality?”, Elizabeth Anderson argues against a common ideal of egalitarian justice that she calls “ luck egalitarianism” and in favor of an approach she calls “democratic equality.”1 According to the luck egalitarian, the aim of justice as equality is to eliminate so far as is possible the impact on people’s lives of bad luck that falls on them through no fault or choice of their own. In the ideal luck egalitarian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   99 citations  
  • On the Road Again: Hayek and the Rule of Law.Juliet Williams - 1997 - Critical Review 11 (1):101-120.
    Abstract In his political writings, F. A. Hayek faces a classic liberal dilemma: he opposes coercion but recognizes that sometimes the state can help to minimize it. Hayek attempts to resolve the dilemma of the limits of state power by offering a definition of the rule of law that does not depend on a controversial conception of rights. However, his effort to formalize the rule of law fails. Not only does Hayek implicitly rely on an undefended theory of rights, but (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Social Justice: The Hayekian Challenge.Steven Lukes - 1997 - Critical Review 11 (1):65-80.
    Abstract Hayek's argument that social justice is a mirage consists of six claims: that the very idea of social justice is meaningless, religious, self?contradictory, and ideological; that realizing any degree of social justice is unfeasible; and that aiming to do so must destroy all liberty. These claims are examined in the light of contemporary theories and debates concerning social justice in order to assess whether the argument's persuasive power is due to sound reasoning, and to what extent contemporary theories of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Relativism and Wide Reflective Equilibrium.Kai Nielsen - 1993 - The Monist 76 (3):316-332.
    The method of appealing to considered judgments in Wide Reflective Equilibrium has been thought to have unwelcome relativistic or ethnocentric implications. This belief, which is widely held, is, I shall argue, mistaken. Wide Reflective equilibrium has no such untoward implications. I shall first specify what I am talking about in speaking of relativism, then generally characterize WRE, then deploy some central arguments for it and finally try to show that it has no relativistic implications.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Contractualism and Utilitarianism.Thomas M. Scanlon - 1982 - In Amartya Kumar Sen & Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. pp. 103--128.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   135 citations  
  • Justice to Charity.Loren E. Lomasky - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (2):32-53.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Wide and Narrow of Reflective Equilibrium.Margaret Holmgren - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):43 - 60.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   251 citations  
  • Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   302 citations  
  • Justice and Charity.Allen Buchanan - 1987 - Ethics 97 (3):558-575.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Preference and Urgency.T. M. Scanlon - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):655-669.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   96 citations  
  • On Some Methods of Ethics and Linguistics.Norman Daniels - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (1):21 - 36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  • Subjective and Objective.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press. pp. 207-222.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • The Claims of Reflective Equilibrium.Joseph Raz - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):307 – 330.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Rational Egoism and the Separateness of Persons.David O. Brink - 1997 - In J. Dancy (ed.), Reading Parfit. Blackwell. pp. 96--134.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy.Thomas Nagel - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):215-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   91 citations  
  • Equality of Opportunity for Welfare Defended and Recanted.R. J. Arneson - 1999 - Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (4):488-497.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Institutions and the Demands of Justice.Liam B. Murphy - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (4):251-291.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  • Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Points.Norman Daniels - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):83 - 103.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.Norman Daniels - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (5):256-282.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   295 citations  
  • Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence.Joseph Raz - 1990 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1):3-46.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3):185-246.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   174 citations  
  • Constitutional Welfare Rights and a Theory of Justice.F. Michaelman - 1975 - In Norman Daniels (ed.), Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls' a Theory of Justice. Stanford University Press. pp. 319--346.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate.Charles Taylor - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations