Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Ian A. Apperly - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):953-970.
    The lack of consensus on how to characterize humans’ capacity for belief reasoning has been brought into sharp focus by recent research. Children fail critical tests of belief reasoning before 3 to 4 years (Wellman, Cross, & Watson, 2001; Wimmer & Perner, 1983), yet infants apparently pass false belief tasks at 13 or 15 months (Onishi & Baillargeon, 2005; Surian, Caldi, & Sperber, 2007). Non-human animals also fail critical tests of belief reasoning but can show very complex social behaviour (e.g., (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   254 citations  
  • Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.Bertram Gawronski & Galen V. Bodenhausen - 2006 - Psychological Bulletin 132 (5):692-731.
    A central theme in recent research on attitudes is the distinction between deliberate, "explicit" attitudes and automatic, "implicit" attitudes. The present article provides an integrative review of the available evidence on implicit and explicit attitude change that is guided by a distinction between associative and propositional processes. Whereas associative processes are characterized by mere activation independent of subjective truth or falsity, propositional reasoning is concerned with the validation of evaluations and beliefs. The proposed associative-propositional evaluation model makes specific assumptions about (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   150 citations  
  • Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.Nicholas Epley, Boaz Keysar, Leaf Van Boven & Thomas Gilovich - 2004 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (3):327.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  • Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen.Andrew Surtees, Dana Samson & Ian Apperly - 2016 - Cognition 148 (C):97-105.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Understanding children's and adults' limitations in mental state reasoning.Paul Bloom - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (6):255-260.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • Limits on theory of mind use in adults.Boaz Keysar, Shuhong Lin & Dale J. Barr - 2003 - Cognition 89 (1):25-41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   113 citations  
  • An association account of false belief understanding.L. C. De Bruin & Albert Newen - 2012 - Cognition 123 (2):240-259.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Perspective tracking in progress: Do not disturb.Paula Rubio-Fernández - 2013 - Cognition 129 (2):264-272.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Encoding of others’ beliefs without overt instruction.Adam S. Cohen & Tamsin C. German - 2009 - Cognition 111 (3):356-363.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults.Adam W. Qureshi, Ian A. Apperly & Dana Samson - 2010 - Cognition 117 (2):230-236.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations