Reviewed Works:B. I. Zil'ber, L. Pacholski, J. Wierzejewski, A. J. Wilkie, Totally Categorical Theories: Structural Properties and the Non-Finite Axiomatizability.B. I. Zil'ber, Strongly Minimal Countably Categorical Theories.B. I. Zil'ber, Strongly Minimal Countably Categorical Theories. II.B. I. Zil'ber, Strongly Minimal Countably Categorical Theories. III.B. I. Zil'ber, E. Mendelson, Totally Categorical Structures and Combinatorial Geometries.B. I. Zil'ber, The Structure of Models of Uncountably Categorical Theories.

This paper completes the proof of the group configuration theorem for simple theories started in [1]. We introduce the notion of an almost hyperdefinable structure, and show that it has a reasonable model theory. We then construct an almost hyperdefinable group from a polygroup chunk.

The main topic of this paper is the investigation of generalized amalgamation properties for simple theories. That is, we are trying to answer the question of when a simple theory has the property of n-dimensional amalgamation, where two-dimensional amalgamation is the Independence Theorem for simple theories. We develop the notions of strong n-simplicity and n-simplicity for 1≤n≤ω, where both “1-simple” and “strongly 1-simple” are the same as “simple”. For strong n-simplicity, we present examples of simple unstable theories in each subclass (...) and prove a characteristic property of strong n-simplicity in terms of strong n-dividing, a strengthening of the dependence relation called dividing in simple theories. We prove a strong three-dimensional amalgamation property for strongly 2-simple theories, and, under an additional assumption, a strong -dimensional amalgamation property for strongly n-simple theories. In the last section of the paper we comment on why strong n-simplicity is called strong. (shrink)

We study generalized amalgamation properties in simple theories. We formulate a notion of generalized amalgamation in such a way so that the properties are preserved when we pass from T to Teq or Theq; we provide several equivalent ways of formulating the notion of generalized amalgamation.We define two distinct hierarchies of simple theories characterized by their amalgamation properties; examples are given to show the difference between the hierarchies.