Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory.Paul Teller - 1995 - Princeton University Press.
    Quantum mechanics is a subject that has captured the imagination of a surprisingly broad range of thinkers, including many philosophers of science. Quantum field theory, however, is a subject that has been discussed mostly by physicists. This is the first book to present quantum field theory in a manner that makes it accessible to philosophers. Because it presents a lucid view of the theory and debates that surround the theory, An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory will interest students of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • What the Quantum Field Is Not.Paul Teller - 1990 - Philosophical Topics 18 (2):175-186.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers.Michael Redhead - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:57 - 99.
    The metaphysical commitments of quantum field theory are examined. A thesis of underdetermination as between field and particle approaches to the "elementary particles" is argued for but only if a disputed notion of transcendental individuality is admitted. The superiority of the field approach is further emphasized in the context of heuristics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Field Theory.Michael Redhead - 1988 - In Harvey R. Brown & Rom HarreĢ (eds.), Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • On the field aspect of quantum fields.Nick Huggett & Robert Weingard - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (3):293 - 301.
    In this paper we contrast the idea of a field as a system with an infinite number of degrees of freedom with a recent alternative proposed by Paul Teller in Teller (1990). We show that, although our characterisation lacks the immediate appeal of Teller's, it has more success producing agreement with intuitive categorisations than his does. We go on to extend the distinction to Quantum Mechanics, explaining the important role that it plays there. Finally, we take some time to investigate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations