Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Newton and Newtonianism in eighteenth-century british thought.Eric Schliesser - 2013 - In James Anthony Harris (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 41.
    This chapter describes various aspects of the impact on philosophy of Newton’s Principia. It shows how Newton’s achievement dramatically influenced debates over the way subsequent philosophers conceived of their activity, and thus prepared the way for an institutional and methodological split between philosophy and science. These large-scale themes are illustrated by attention to a number of detailed debates over the nature and importance of Newton’s legacy: debates concerning gravity and matter theory, the status of Newton’s “laws of motion”, the role (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Absolute and Ordained Power of God in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Theology.Francis Oakley - 1998 - Journal of the History of Ideas 59 (3):437-461.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:The Absolute and Ordained Power of God in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century TheologyFrancis Oakley[W]e must cautiously abandon [that more specious opinion of the Platonist and Stoick]... in this, that it... blasphemously invades the cardinal Prerogative of Divinity, Omnipotence, by denying him a reserved power, of infringing, or altering any one of those Laws which [He] Himself ordained, and enacted, and chaining up his armes in the adamantine fetters of Destiny.Walter (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The reception of cartesianism.John Henry - 2013 - In Peter R. Anstey (ed.), The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 116.
    This chapter, which examines the work of Rene Descartes and the reception of Cartesianism in Great Britain in the seventeenth century, suggests that Descartes was an undeniably influential figure during this period, and explains that he exposed the faults of the philosophy before him and pointed the way forward. It also highlights the fact that Cartesianism was accepted in the universities after Aristotelianism was significantly affected by innovations in the sciences and university curricula in natural philosophy had to be changed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Voluntarism and early modern science.Peter Harrison - 2002 - History of Science 40 (1):63-89.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes.Steven Shapin - 1981 - Isis 72:187-215.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes.Steven Shapin - 1981 - Isis 72 (2):187-215.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • The Philosophy of Bishop Stillingfleet.Richard H. Popkin - 1971 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (3):303-319.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:The Philosophy of Bishop Stillingfleet RICHARD H. POPKIN EDWARD STILLINGFLEET(1635-1699), the Bishop of Worcester, is known only as Locke's opponent. Although he was a leading figure in seventeenth century intellectual history, he is now almost completely forgotten.1 He is only mentioned once in the Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the first person to write against Deism. 2 His texts have been ditlicult to locate, and have hardly been studied. Although (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • From Immanent Natures to Nature as Artifice.Margaret J. Osler - 1996 - The Monist 79 (3):388-407.
    A commonplace in traditional historiography is the claim that an important aspect of the demise of Aristotelianism during the Scientific Revolution was a change in the concept of causality, a change which eliminated final causes from science. Projecting twentieth-century metaphysical presuppositions onto the ostensibly revolutionary thought of early modern natural philosophers, E. A. Burtt declared.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Voluntarism and the origins of modern science: A reply to John Henry.Peter Harrison - 2009 - History of Science 47 (2):223-231.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Laws of nature.John R. Milton - 1998 - In Daniel Garber & Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1--680.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Religion and the Scientific Revolution.John Henry - 2010 - In Peter Harrison (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion. Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations