Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Openness in Big Data and Data Repositories.Vicki Xafis & Markus K. Labude - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3):255-273.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Big Data and Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare and Research.Angela Ballantyne & Cameron Stewart - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3):315-326.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Cross-Sectoral Big Data.Graeme T. Laurie - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3):327-339.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Precision Medicine and Big Data.G. Owen Schaefer, E. Shyong Tai & Shirley Sun - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3):275-288.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Real-World Data to Generate Evidence About Healthcare Interventions.Wendy Lipworth - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3):289-298.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Healthcare.Tamra Lysaght, Hannah Yeefen Lim, Vicki Xafis & Kee Yuan Ngiam - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3):299-314.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Research‐Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight.Nancy E. Kass, Ruth R. Faden, Steven N. Goodman, Peter Pronovost, Sean Tunis & Tom L. Beauchamp - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (s1):4-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Inclusion and Exclusion in Women's Access to Health and Medicine.Susan Dodds - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):58-79.
    Women's access to health and medicine in developed countries has been characterized by a range of inconsistent inclusions and exclusions. Health policy has been asymmetrically interested in womens reproductive capacities and has sought to regulate, control, and manage aspects of womens reproductive decision making in a manner unwitnessed in relation to men's reproductive health and reproductive decision making. In other areas, research that addresses health concerns that affect both men and women sometimes is designed so as not to yield data (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.Brent Daniel Mittelstadt & Luciano Floridi - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):303-341.
    The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as ‘Big Data’, this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and business contexts sometimes seemingly related only by the gigantic size of the datasets being considered. As is often the case with the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress, understanding of the ethical implications (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • The Acceptability of Conducting Data Linkage Research Without Obtaining Consent: Lay People’s Views and Justifications.Vicki Xafis - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):79.
    A key ethical issue arising in data linkage research relates to consent requirements. Patients’ consent preferences in the context of health research have been explored but their consent preferences regarding data linkage specifically have been under-explored. In addition, the views on data linkage are often those of patient groups. As a result, little is known about lay people’s views and their preferences about consent requirements in the context of data linkage. This study explores lay people’s views and justifications regarding the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Ethical Frameworks in Public Health Decision-Making: Defending a Value-Based and Pluralist Approach.Kalle Grill & Angus Dawson - 2017 - Health Care Analysis 25 (4):291-307.
    A number of ethical frameworks have been proposed to support decision-making in public health and the evaluation of public health policy and practice. This is encouraging, since ethical considerations are of paramount importance in health policy. However, these frameworks have various deficiencies, in part because they incorporate substantial ethical positions. In this article, we discuss and criticise a framework developed by James Childress and Ruth Bernheim, which we consider to be the state of the art in the field. Their framework (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Why Bioethics Needs a Concept of Vulnerability.Wendy Rogers, Catriona Mackenzie & Susan Dodds - 2012 - Ijfab: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):11-38.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels.Florencia Luna - 2009 - Ijfab: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121-139.
    In this article I examine several criticisms of the concept of vulnerability. Rather than rejecting the concept, however, I argue that a sufficiently rich understanding of vulnerability is essential to bioethics. The challenges of international research in developing countries require an understanding of how new vulnerabilities arise from conditions of economic, social and political exclusion. A serious shortcoming of current conceptions of vulnerability in research ethics is the tendency to treat vulnerability as a label fixed on a particular subpopulation. My (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Balancing in Ethical Deliberation: Superior to Specification and Casuistry.Joseph P. Demarco & Paul J. Ford - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):483 – 497.
    Approaches to clinical ethics dilemmas that rely on basic principles or rules are difficult to apply because of vagueness and conflict among basic values. In response, casuistry rejects the use of basic values, and specification produces a large set of specified rules that are presumably easily applicable. Balancing is a method employed to weigh the relative importance of different and conflicting values in application. We argue against casuistry and specification, claiming that balancing is superior partly because it most clearly exhibits (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Vulnerability in Research Ethics: A Way Forward.Margaret Meek Lange, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (6):333-340.
    Several foundational documents of bioethics mention the special obligation researchers have to vulnerable research participants. However, the treatment of vulnerability offered by these documents often relies on enumeration of vulnerable groups rather than an analysis of the features that make such groups vulnerable. Recent attempts in the scholarly literature to lend philosophical weight to the concept of vulnerability are offered by Luna and Hurst. Luna suggests that vulnerability is irreducibly contextual and that Institutional Review Boards (Research Ethics Committees) can only (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • The Social Licence for Research: Whycare.Dataran Into Trouble.Pam Carter, Graeme T. Laurie & Mary Dixon-Woods - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (5):404-409.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Community Consent for Genetic Research.Charles Weijer - unknown
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation