4 found
Order:
See also
Adriana Warmbier
Jagiellonian University
  1. Podwójna struktura podmiotowości. O Ricoeurowskiej lekturze Kartezjusza. Dual structure of subjectivity. Ricoeur towards Descartes.Adriana Warmbier - 2013 - Ruch Filozoficzny 70 (2).
    What I would like to study is the presence of Cartesian manner of thinking in the Ricoeurian comprehension of subjectivity. I focus particularly on what is not saying expressis verbis in his argumentation. I do not say that the Ricoeurian conception of dialectical subject which is expressed as “oneself as another” places itself as continuation of the tradition of absolutization of cogito. By no means. Ricoeur’s investigation that pertains to subjectivity aims at elaborating its new formulation. Philosophy of Descartes might (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. O tzw. „końcu podmiotu”- współczesne rewizjonistyczne konteksty filozoficzne. A few words on the „end of man”. Polemical contexts in current philosophy.Adriana Warmbier - 2014 - Zarządzanie Publiczne 29 (3):45-56.
    In the paper, the author asks whether what we have all heard over and over again of the “end of man” means the real end of man or, on the contrary, it has given rise to profound and necessary reevaluation of self-transparent subjectivity. The debate on the notion of selfhood has not been closed yet. The author analyses two different approaches to the problem. One pertains to the “self” that is taken as a monad. The other refers to dialogical theory (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Człowiek - podmiot - duchowość. Zadomowienie w antropologicznej Wieży Babel. [REVIEW]Adriana Warmbier - 2013 - Kwartalnik Filozoficzny (4):213-222.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Moral Perfection and the Demand for Human Enhancement.Adriana Warmbier - forthcoming - Ethics in Progress 2015 (No.1).
    In this article I discuss one of the most significant areas of bioethical interest, which is the problem of moral enhancement. Since I claim that the crucial issue in the current debate on human bioenhancement is the problem of agency, I bring out and examine the conditions of possibility of self-understanding, acting subjects attributing responsible authorship for their actions to themselves. I shall argue that the very idea of moral enhancement, properly understood, fails to justify the claims that enhancing the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark