The standard associative account of implicit bias posits that the mind unavoidably mirrors the biased co-occurrences that are present in the environment. The resulting fatalistic view of implicit bias as inevitable and immutable is both scientifically unwarranted and societally counterproductive.

“What is the structure of thought?” is as central a question as any in cognitive science. A classic answer to this question has appealed to a Language of Thought (LoT). We point to emerging research from disparate branches of the field that supports the LoT hypothesis, but also uncovers diversity in LoTs across cognitive systems, stages of development, and species. Our letter formulates open research questions for cognitive science concerning the varieties of rules and representations that underwrite various LoT-based systems (...) and how these variations can help researchers taxonomize cognitive systems. (shrink)

Natalia Tomashpolskaia, "Predictive World", pp. 301–308. -/- In the contemporary world, the scientific model of reality has become prognostic and predictive. Scientists make predictions based on facts, re- search, and experiments. These predictions create a new picture of reality and have a great impact on people’s behavior and decision-making. For in- stance, we can observe a vivid manifestation of this phenomenon in mod- ern medicine. Prognosis replaces diagnoses, and diagnoses and vital de- cisions begin to be based on a prognosis. (...) However, not only sciences, but the mass-media news industry also has become prognostic. Nowadays, the prevailing part of all news consists not of facts but of predictions and pro- gnoses (economic, political, societal, environmental, medical, etc.). All types of analysts and prognosticators in all spheres have become in de- mand. To sum up, nowadays we do not live here and now but we are living in constant stress awaiting negative events based on some prognosis we have believed in and these beliefs condition our current behaviour. (shrink)