The book is a philosophical refection on the possibility of mathematical history. Are poosible models of historical phenomena so exact as those of physical ones? Mathematical models borrowed from quantum mechanics by the meditation of its interpretations are accomodated to history. The conjecture of many-variant history, alternative history, or counterfactual history is necessary for mathematical history. Conclusions about philosophy of history are inferred.

The book is devoted to the contemporary stage of quantum mechanics – quantum information, and especially to its philosophical interpretation and comprehension: the first one of a series monographs about the philosophy of quantum information. The second will consider Be l l ’ s inequalities, their modified variants and similar to them relations. The beginning of quantum information was in the thirties of the last century. Its speed development has started over the last two decades. The main phenomenon is entanglement. (...) The subareas are quantum computer, quantum communication (and teleportation), and quantum cryptography. The book offers the following main conceptions, theses and hypotheses: – dualistic Phythagoreanism as a new kind among the interpretations of quantum mechanics and information: arithmetical, logical, and metamathematical one; – Gödel ’ s first incompleteness theorem is an undecidable proposition, and consequently the second one,too. – a partial rehabilitation of Hilbert ’ s program for the self-foundation of mathematics; – the dual-foundation of mathematics; – Skolemian relativity between: Cantor ’s kinds of infinity, finiteness and infinity, discreteness and continuity, completeness and incompleteness, etc.; – information is a physical quantity representing the non-reducibility of a system to its parts, particularly nonaddtivity; – there exist pure relations «by itself», which cannot be reduced to predications; – energy conservation can and should be generalized; – Einstein’ s «general covariance» or «principle of relativity» can and should be generalized to cover discrete morphisms where the notion of velocity does not make sense. (shrink)

У статті мова йде відносно аналізу категорій «загальнолюдське» та «класове» у широкому філософському та гуманістичному сенсі і відносно аспектів здійснення цих категорій стосовно до категорій «освіта» та «виховання» у вузькому сенсі. Розглядаються проблемні питання методології та діалектики взаємодії категорій «загальнолюдське» та «класове». Показується актуальність розробки принципів «субординованої діалектики» у нових умовах розвитку виховно-освітніх відношень. Також категорії «освіта» та «виховання» розглядаються, з одного боку, як конкретно-історичні, тобто класові, принципи формування особистості, а з другого боку, як конкретно-визначені стадії загальнолюдського процесу розвитку людини.

The possibility of switching to two new approaches – meta-historical analysis of the changes theocratic and secular forms of domination and governance, as well as the creation of an institutional matrix of religious and political space of the state, which are in line with the traditions of Ukrainian religious studies theorizing. New methods of knowledge interaction between religion and politics in public life in one of the basic institutions – the phenomenon of faith. They are based on various grounds, its (...) different systems concepts and different definitions and perspectives of the content review identified institutional changes in religion and politics. A comparison of these approaches is interesting also because they realized a fundamentally different way of constructing social knowledge about the interaction of religion and politics. (shrink)