- Skeptical Rationalism.William Berkson - 1987 - In Joseph Agassi & I. C. Jarvie (eds.), Rationality: the critical view. Hingham, MA, USA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 21--43.details
|
|
The Logics of Discovery in Popper’s Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303-319.details
|
|
Bias, incompetence, or bad management?John Ziman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-246.details
|
|
Reliability and validity of peer review.David Zeaman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-245.details
|
|
Competency testing for reviewers and editors.Rosalyn S. Yalow - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):244-245.details
|
|
Experimenter and reviewer bias.Joseph C. Witt & Michael J. Hannafin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):243-244.details
|
|
Research on peer-review practices: Problems of interpretation, application, and propriety.William A. Wilson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):242-243.details
|
|
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.details
|
|
Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Murray J. White - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-241.details
|
|
The Rationality of Extremists: A Talmonist Insight We Need to Respond to.John Wettersten - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (1):31-53.details
|
|
Searching for the holy in the ascent of Imre Lakatos.John Wettersten - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):84-150.details
|
|
Popper's theory of the closed society conflicts with his theory of research.John Wettersten - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):185-209.details
|
|
Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts.Garth J. Thomas - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):240-240.details
|
|
Responsibility in reviewing and research.Sol Tax & Robert A. Rubinstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-240.details
|
|
My two 'difficulties'.Charlene Tan - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (4):639–662.details
|
|
Beyond Barbour or back to basics? The future of science-and-religion and the Quest for unity.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):235-258.details
|
|
The Logics of Discovery in Popper’s Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.details
|
|
Pseudoscience and Idiosyncratic Theories of Rational Belief.Nicholas Shackel - 2013 - In M. Pigliucci & M. Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 417-438.details
|
|
Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci's target article.William A. Scott - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-238.details
|
|
Anosmic peer review: A rose by another name is evidently not a rose.Sandra Scarr - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):237-238.details
|
|
Normative naturalism and the challenge of relativism: Laudan versus Worrall on the justification of methodological principles.Howard Sankey - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):37 – 51.details
|
|
Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review.Donald B. Rubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-237.details
|
|
Why advocate pancritical rationalism?Darrell Patrick Rowbottom & Otávio Bueno - 2007 - In R. S. Cohen & Z. Parusniková (eds.), Rethinking Popper, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 81--89.details
|
|
The myth of 'scientific method' in contemporary educational research.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom & Sarah Jane Aiston - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (2):137–156.details
|
|
How to change it: modes of engagement, rationality, and stance voluntarism.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom & Otávio Bueno - 2011 - Synthese 178 (1):7-17.details
|
|
Rejecting published work: Similar fate for fiction.Chuck Ross - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-236.details
|
|
Reliability and bias in peer-review practices.Robert Rosenthal - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):235-236.details
|
|
Knowing and guessing.Gerard Radnitzky - 1982 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1):110-121.details
|
|
Reviewer reliability: Confusing random error with systematic error or bias.Stanley Presser - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):234-235.details
|
|
2004: A scenario of peer review in the future.Alan L. Porter - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):233-234.details
|
|
W.W. Bartley, III 1934–1990.Angelo M. Petroni - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (4):737-742.details
|
|
Peer-review research: Objections and obligations.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246-255.details
|
|
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.details
|
|
Reviewer “bias”: Do Peters and Ceci protest too much?Daniel Perlman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):231-232.details
|
|
Improving research on and policies for peer-review practices.Richard M. Perloff & Robert Perloff - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):232-233.details
|
|
Biases, decisions and auctorial rebuttal in the peer-review process.David S. Palermo - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):230-231.details
|
|
What is the source of bias in peer review?Ray Over - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):229-230.details
|
|
Regress and the doctrine of epistemic original sin.Andrew Norman - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):477-494.details
|
|
A Bootstrap Theory of Rationality.Jonas Nilsson - 2005 - Theoria 71 (2):182-199.details
|
|
Reliability, bias, or quality: What is the issue?Katherine Nelson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):229-229.details
|
|
Rejecting published work: It couldn't happen in physics! (or could it?).Michael J. Moravcsik - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):228-229.details
|
|
Designing peer review for the subjective as well as the objective side of science.Ian I. Mitroff - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):227-228.details
|
|
When we practice to deceive: The ethics of a metascientific inquiry.Burton Mindick - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):226-227.details
|
|
Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article.Jason Millman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):225-226.details
|
|
Reform peer review: The Peters and Ceci study in the context of other current studies of scientific evaluation.Clyde Manwell & C. M. Ann Baker - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):221-225.details
|
|
Publication, politics, and scientific progress.Michael J. Mahoney - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):220-221.details
|
|
Peer review: Prediction of the future or judgment of the past?Richard T. Louttit - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):219-220.details
|
|
Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics.David Lazarus - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):219-219.details
|
|
The ethical foundations of behavior therapy.Richard F. Kitchener - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):221 – 238.details
|
|
The Grounds of Reason.Joseph Agassi, I. C. Jarvie & Tom Settle - 1971 - Philosophy 46 (175):43 - 50.details
|
|