- How to change it: modes of engagement, rationality, and stance voluntarism.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom & Otávio Bueno - 2011 - Synthese 178 (1):7-17.details
|
|
Alfred Sidgwick's 'rogative' approach to argumentation.Flemming Steen Nielsen - unknowndetails
|
|
A Problem for Popper's Fallibilism.Ladislav Kvasz & Eugen Zeleňák - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. London: Springer. pp. 71--81.details
|
|
Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science.David F. Horrobin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):217-218.details
|
|
Authorship and manuscript reviewing: The risk of bias.Lois DeBakey - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):208-209.details
|
|
Optional published refereeing.R. A. Gordon - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):213-214.details
|
|
Judging document content versus social functions of refereeing: Possible and impossible tasks.Belver C. Griffith - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):214-215.details
|
|
Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula.J. Scott Armstrong - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):197-199.details
|
|
(1 other version)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-255.details
|
|
Pseudoscience and Idiosyncratic Theories of Rational Belief.Nicholas Shackel - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 417-438.details
|
|
A New–old Characterisation of Logical Knowledge.Ivor Grattan-Guinness - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):245 - 290.details
|
|
(1 other version)Skeptical rationalism.William Berkson - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):281 – 320.details
|
|
What is wrong with intelligent design?Gregory W. Dawes - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.details
|
|
Normative naturalism and the challenge of relativism: Laudan versus Worrall on the justification of methodological principles.Howard Sankey - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):37 – 51.details
|
|
Ratio Negativa—The Popperian Challenge.Zuzana Parusniková - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. London: Springer. pp. 31--45.details
|
|
The insufficiencies of methodological inadequacy.Robert Hogan - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-216.details
|
|
Publication, politics, and scientific progress.Michael J. Mahoney - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):220-221.details
|
|
The fate of published articles, submitted again.John J. Bartko - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):199-199.details
|
|
Peer review and the structure of knowledge.Marian Blissett - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):203-204.details
|
|
Rejecting published work: Similar fate for fiction.Chuck Ross - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-236.details
|
|
Experimenter and reviewer bias.Joseph C. Witt & Michael J. Hannafin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):243-244.details
|
|
(1 other version)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Logics of Discovery in Popper’s Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.details
|
|
Will the Popperian Feyerabend please step forward: Pluralistic, Popperian themes in the philosophy of Paul Feyerabend.Robert P. Farrell - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):257 – 266.details
|
|
Peer review in the physical sciences: An editor's view.William M. Honig - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-217.details
|
|
When will the editors start to edit?Leonard D. Goodstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):212-213.details
|
|
Competency testing for reviewers and editors.Rosalyn S. Yalow - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):244-245.details
|
|
Should Popper’s View of Rationality Be Used for Promoting Teacher Knowledge?Stephanie Chitpin - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (8):833-844.details
|
|
Regress and the doctrine of epistemic original sin.Andrew Norman - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):477-494.details
|
|
The ethical foundations of behavior therapy.Richard F. Kitchener - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):221 – 238.details
|
|
Explaining an unsurprising demonstration: High rejection rates and scarcity of space.Janice M. Beyer - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):202-203.details
|
|
On the failure to detect previously published research.Donald deB Beaver - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):199-200.details
|
|
Reliability and validity of peer review.David Zeaman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-245.details
|
|
Popper's Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation.Monica Aufrecht - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):223-225.details
|
|
W.W. Bartley, III 1934–1990.Angelo M. Petroni - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (4):737-742.details
|
|
Bias, incompetence, or bad management?John Ziman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-246.details
|
|
Research on peer-review practices: Problems of interpretation, application, and propriety.William A. Wilson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):242-243.details
|
|
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.details
|
|
Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Murray J. White - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-241.details
|
|
The Rationality of Extremists: A Talmonist Insight We Need to Respond to.John Wettersten - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (1):31-53.details
|
|
Searching for the holy in the ascent of Imre Lakatos.John Wettersten - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):84-150.details
|
|
Popper's theory of the closed society conflicts with his theory of research.John Wettersten - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):185-209.details
|
|
Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts.Garth J. Thomas - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):240-240.details
|
|
Responsibility in reviewing and research.Sol Tax & Robert A. Rubinstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-240.details
|
|
My two 'difficulties'.Charlene Tan - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (4):639–662.details
|
|
Beyond Barbour or back to basics? The future of science-and-religion and the Quest for unity.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):235-258.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Logics of Discovery in Popper’s Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303-319.details
|
|
Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci's target article.William A. Scott - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-238.details
|
|
Anosmic peer review: A rose by another name is evidently not a rose.Sandra Scarr - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):237-238.details
|
|
Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review.Donald B. Rubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-237.details
|
|