Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ist gruppennützige Forschung mit nicht-einwilligungsfähigen Erwachsenen gerechtfertigt? Ethische Bewertung der neuen Regelung im Arzneimittelgesetz.Astrid Gieselmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2020 - Ethik in der Medizin 32 (2):155-169.
    Im Zuge einer Änderung des Arzneimittelgesetzes im November 2016 hat der Deutsche Bundestag beschlossen, dass gruppennützige Arzneimittelforschung mit nicht-einwilligungsfähigen Erwachsenen unter bestimmten Bedingungen erlaubt sein soll. Das entsprechende Gesetz wird voraussichtlich im Jahr 2020 in Kraft treten. Das ethische Problem dieser Forschung besteht darin, dass Personen, die nicht in der Lage sind, ihre Einwilligung in die Forschung zu erteilen, nicht vom medizinischen Fortschritt ausgeschlossen werden sollen. Der Gesetzgeber hat versucht, diesen Konflikt zu lösen, indem er die Zulässigkeit der gruppennützigen Forschung (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Advance Research Directives in Germany: A Proposal for a Disclosure Standard.Matthé Scholten - 2018 - GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 31 (2):77-86.
    The fourth amendment to the German Medicinal Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz) states that nontherapeutic research in incompetent populations is permissible under the condition that potential research participants expressly declare their wish to participate in scientific research in an advance research directive. This article explores the implementation of advance research directives in Germany against the background of the international legal and ethical framework for biomedical research. In particular, it addresses a practical problem that arises from the disclosure requirement for advance research directives. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Medical research in clinical emergency settings in Europe.S. Lötjönen - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):183-187.
    Clinical emergencies necessitate immediate action to avert the danger to the patient's life or health. Emergency patients might be in greatest need of novel therapies, and even presumed willing to assume some risk, but research into emergency conditions should be conducted under commonly accepted principles that fulfil the scientific, ethical, and legal criteria. Such criteria already exist in the US, but are still under development in Europe.This article introduces criteria upon which trials in emergency settings may be ethically and legally (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Confronting ethical permissibility in animal research: rejecting a common assumption and extending a principle of justice.Chong Un Choe Smith - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):175-185.
    A common assumption in the selection of nonhuman animal subjects for research and the approval of research is that, if the risks of a procedure are too great for humans, and if there is a so-called scientific necessity, then it is permissible to use nonhuman animal subjects. I reject the common assumption as neglecting the central ethical issue of the permissibility of using nonhuman animal subjects and as being inconsistent with the principle of justice used in human subjects research ethics. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Advance Directives: The Principle of Determining Authenticity.Matilda Carter - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (1):32-41.
    Hastings Center Report, Volume 52, Issue 1, Page 32-41, January/February 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Advance directives in dementia research: The opinions and arguments of clinical researchers − an empirical study.Karin Jongsma & Suzanne van de Vathorst - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (1):4-14.
    In order to discover an effective treatment for dementia it is necessary to include dementia patients in clinical research trials. Dementia patients face an increased risk to lose the capacity to consent to research participation, and research possibilities with incompetent participants are legally strictly limited. One solution is for patients to consent to research through an advance research directive whilst still competent. In order to explore whether such a directive would be useful and valuable in practice we conducted a qualitative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.Tom Buller - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (8):701-707.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Advanced Care Planning: Promoting Autonomy in Caring for People with Dementia.Francesca Bosisio & Gaia Barazzetti - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):93-95.
    Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2020, Page 93-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Honoring the Multiple Dimensions of Autonomy in All Phases of Treatment and Care.Robin Pierce - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (2):104-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Advance research directives: avoiding double standards.Bert Heinrichs - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-8.
    BackgroundAdvance research directives (ARD) have been suggested as a means by which to facilitate research with incapacitated subjects, in particular in the context of dementia research. However, established disclosure requirements for study participation raise an ethical problem for the application of ARDs: While regular consent procedures call for detailed information on a specific study (“token disclosure”), ARDs can typically only include generic information (“type disclosure”). The introduction of ARDs could thus establish a double standard in the sense that within the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations