Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Will to Truth in the Philosophy of Pragmatism.D. Y. Snitko - 2017 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 12:113-120.
    Purpose. Since the clear statement of the will-to-truth question as an existential has not been fulfilled before, this article is devoted to the solution of such a task. In connection with the above, the purpose of the study is to analyze the phenomenon of will to truth in the philosophy of pragmatism. This involves the following tasks: the definition of the basic principles of understanding the truth in the works of theorists of pragmatism; analysis of the phenomenon of «will to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Voluntarism: A Difference That Makes the Difference Between German Idealism and American Pragmatism?Daniel J. Brunson - 2018 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 10 (2).
    This paper proposes an alternative perspective on the question of the relationship between German Idealism and American Pragmatism through attention to the philosophy of Josiah Royce. Despite being seen as a Hegelian, Royce declared himself a pragmatist. However, he also called his position Absolute Voluntarism. This paper suggests that the real issue between Idealism and Pragmatism is Intellectualism vs. Voluntarism. This distinction both parallels and cuts across the traditions of German Idealism and American Pragmatism, and promises to open up a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Overcoming the Divide Between Freedom and Nature: Clarisse Coignet on the Metaphysics of Independent Morality.Jeremy Dunham - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-22.
    ABSTRACTClarisse Coignet played an important role in a number of the most important intellectual movements in nineteenth-century France. She grew up around and documented the leaders of...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Practical Grounds for Belief: Kant and James on Religion.Neil W. Williams & Joe Saunders - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):1269-1282.
    Both Kant and James claim to limit the role of knowledge in order to make room for faith. In this paper, we argue that despite some similarities, their attempts to do this come apart. Our main claim is that, although both Kant and James justify our adopting religious beliefs on practical grounds, James believes that we can—and should—subsequently assess such beliefs on the basis of evidence. We offer our own account of this evidence and discuss what this difference means for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation