- Causality in the logic of decision.Patrick Maher - 1987 - Theory and Decision 22 (2):155-172.details
|
|
Intentions are Optimality Beliefs – But Optimizing What?Christoph Lumer - 2005 - Erkenntnis 62 (2):235-262.details
|
|
Newcomb’s problem isn’t a choice dilemma.Zhanglyu Li & Frank Zenker - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):5125-5143.details
|
|
The No Probabilities For Acts-Principle.Marion Ledwig - 2005 - Synthese 144 (2):171-180.details
|
|
Regret and instability in causal decision theory.James M. Joyce - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):123-145.details
|
|
Are Newcomb problems really decisions?James M. Joyce - 2006 - Synthese 156 (3):537-562.details
|
|
A problem for confirmation theoretic accounts of the conjunction fallacy.Martin Jönsson & Elias Assarsson - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (2):437-449.details
|
|
Non-Measurability, Imprecise Credences, and Imprecise Chances.Yoaav Isaacs, Alan Hájek & John Hawthorne - 2021 - Mind 131 (523):892-916.details
|
|
Newcomb's problem, prisoners' dilemma, and collective action.S. L. Hurley - 1991 - Synthese 86 (2):173 - 196.details
|
|
Logic and probability.Colin Howson - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):517-531.details
|
|
What is the 'Cause' in Causal Decision Theory?Christopher Hitchcock - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (1):129-146.details
|
|
Conditioning, intervening, and decision.Christopher Hitchcock - 2016 - Synthese 193 (4).details
|
|
Clark Glymour’s responses to the contributions to the Synthese special issue “Causation, probability, and truth: the philosophy of Clark Glymour”.Clark Glymour - 2016 - Synthese 193 (4):1251-1285.details
|
|
Newcomb’s Problem, Arif Ahmed (editor). Cambridge University Press, 2018, 233 pages. [REVIEW]J. Dmitri Gallow - 2020 - Economics and Philosophy 36 (1):171-176.details
|
|
Violations of probability theory: What do they mean?Deborah E. Frisch - 1988 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 18 (2):137–148.details
|
|
Non-bayesian foundations for statistical estimation, prediction, and the ravens example.Malcolm R. Forster - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (3):357 - 376.details
|
|
The paradox of confirmation.Branden Fitelson - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.details
|
|
A bayesian account of independent evidence with applications.Branden Fitelson - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S123-.details
|
|
A Deliberative Approach to Causation.Fernandes Alison Sutton - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (3):686-708.details
|
|
Probabilism, Representation Theorems, and Whether Deliberation Crowds Out Prediction.Edward Elliott - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (2):379-399.details
|
|
A Representation Theorem for Frequently Irrational Agents.Edward Elliott - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (5):467-506.details
|
|
Some counterexamples to causal decision theory.Andy Egan - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (1):93-114.details
|
|
Ratifiability, game theory, and the principle of independence of irrelevant alternatives.Ellery Eells & William L. Harper - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (1):1 – 19.details
|
|
The popcorn problem: Sobel on evidential decision theory and deliberation-probability dynamics.Ellery Eells - 1989 - Synthese 81 (1):9 - 20.details
|
|
Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support.Ellery Eells & Branden Fitelson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):129 - 142.details
|
|
Learning with detachment: Reply to Maher.Ellery Eells - 1987 - Theory and Decision 22 (2):173-180.details
|
|
Metatickles and the dynamics of deliberation.Ellery Eells - 1984 - Theory and Decision 17 (1):71-95.details
|
|
Newcomb's many solutions.Ellery Eells - 1984 - Theory and Decision 16 (1):59-105.details
|
|
Objective probability theory theory.Ellery Eells - 1983 - Synthese 57 (3):387 - 442.details
|
|
Objective Probability Theory Theory.Ellery Eells - 2010 - In Ellery Eells & James H. Fetzer (eds.), Synthese. Springer. pp. 3--44.details
|
|
A classification of Newcomb problems and decision theories.Kenny Easwaran - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 27):6415-6434.details
|
|
Further results on the intransitivity of evidential support.Igor Douven - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):487-497.details
|
|
The Deductive Method.Daniel M. Hausman - 1990 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):372-388.details
|
|
Preference-based arguments for probabilism.David Christensen - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (3):356-376.details
|
|
The newcomb problem: An unqualified resolution.Simon Burgess - 2004 - Synthese 138 (2):261 - 287.details
|
|
Newcomb’s problem and its conditional evidence: a common cause of confusion.Simon Burgess - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):319-339.details
|
|
Ratifiability and the Logic of Decision1.Brian Skyrms - 1990 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):44-56.details
|
|
Decision-theoretic paradoxes as voting paradoxes.Rachael Briggs - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):1-30.details
|
|
Agency, Desire, and Changing Organizational Routines.Caleb Bernacchio - 2018 - Philosophy of Management 17 (3):279-301.details
|
|
Bayesian Convergence and the Fair-Balance Paradox.Bengt Autzen - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (2):253-263.details
|
|
The Place of Probability in Science: In Honor of Ellery Eells (1953-2006).Ellery Eells & James H. Fetzer (eds.) - 2010 - Springer.details
|
|
Bayes' theorem.James Joyce - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Bayesianism, Medical Decisions, and Responsibility.Masaki Ichinose - 2006 - In 21st Century C. O. E. Program Dals (ed.), Philosophy of Uncertainty and Medical Decisions. Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, The University of Tokyo. pp. 15-42.details
|
|
Philosophy as conceptual engineering: Inductive logic in Rudolf Carnap's scientific philosophy.Christopher F. French - 2015 - Dissertation, University of British Columbiadetails
|
|
A Rationalization of Cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.Wolfgang Spohn - unknowndetails
|
|
Dependency Equilibria and the Causal Structure of Decision and Game Situation.Wolfgang Spohn - unknowndetails
|
|
Truth Evaluability in Radical Interpretation Theory.Eleni Manolakaki - 2000 - Dissertation, Philosophydetails
|
|
Probabilistic Arguments in the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation.Christoph Lumer - 2011 - In Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden & Gordon Mitchell (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rozenberg; Sic Sat. pp. 1141-1154.details
|
|
How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens.Branden Fitelson & James Hawthorne - 2010 - In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer. pp. 247--275.details
|
|
Realizing Newcomb’s Problem.Peter Slezak - unknowndetails
|
|