- Non-epistemic values and scientific assessment: an adequacy-for-purpose view.Greg Lusk & Kevin C. Elliott - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (2):1-22.details
|
|
Underdetermination, holism, and feminist philosophy of science.Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-12.details
|
|
Against border patrols.Mariam Thalos - 2017 - In Maarten Boudry & Massimo Pigliucci (eds.), Science unlimited?: the challenges of scientism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 283–301.details
|
|
Epistemic Standards for Participatory Technology Assessment: Suggestions Based Upon Well-Ordered Science.Juan M. Durán & Zachary Pirtle - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1709-1741.details
|
|
Information elaboration and epistemic effects of diversity.Daniel Steel, Sina Fazelpour, Bianca Crewe & Kinley Gillette - 2019 - Synthese 198 (2):1287-1307.details
|
|
(1 other version)Stéphanie Ruphy: Scientific Pluralism Reconsidered. A New Approach to the (Dis)Unity of Science.Maria Sojka - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (1):191-194.details
|
|
Love Slaves and Wonder Women: Radical Feminism and Social Reform in the Psychology of William Moulton Marston.Matthew J. Brown - 2016 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1):1.details
|
|
(1 other version)Intrinsic Ethics Regarding Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Management.Erich W. Schienke, Seth D. Baum, Nancy Tuana, Kenneth J. Davis & Klaus Keller - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):503-523.details
|
|
Fuller and Rouse on the Legitimation of Scientific Knowledge.Francis Remedios - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):444-463.details
|
|
Decentring the discoverer: how AI helps us rethink scientific discovery.Elinor Clark & Donal Khosrowi - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-26.details
|
|
Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus.Matthew H. Slater, Joanna K. Huxster & Emily R. Scholfield - 2022 - Erkenntnis 89 (3):1043-1064.details
|
|
Monist and Pluralist Approaches on Underdetermination: A Case Study in Evolutionary Microbiology.Thomas Bonnin - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (1):135-155.details
|
|
Discrimination and Collaboration in Science.Hannah Rubin & Cailin O’Connor - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (3):380-402.details
|
|
From black and white to shades of grey.Lotta Leden, Lena Hansson & Andreas Redfors - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (5):483-511.details
|
|
The Elusive Notion of “Argument Quality”.Michael H. G. Hoffmann - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (2):213-240.details
|
|
Value of cognitive diversity in science.Samuli Pöyhönen - 2017 - Synthese 194 (11):4519-4540.details
|
|
Kraepelin’s psychiatry in the pragmatic age.David Rattray - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (1):1-35.details
|
|
Against the philosophical project of “biologizing” race.Anthony F. Peressini - 2021 - Metaphilosophy 52 (5):593-615.details
|
|
My objectivity is better than yours: contextualising debates about gender inequality.Rosie Worsdale & Jack Wright - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):1659-1683.details
|
|
Feminist Metaphysics: Can This Marriage be Saved?Jennifer McKitrick - 2018 - In Pieranna Garavaso (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Feminism. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 58-79.details
|
|
Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion.Gregory W. Dawes - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):283-298.details
|
|
Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies. [REVIEW]Leena Tulkki - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (3):314-317.details
|
|
Extra-academic transdisciplinarity and scientific pluralism: what might they learn from one another?Inkeri Koskinen & Uskali Mäki - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (3):419-444.details
|
|
(1 other version)Intrinsic Ethics Regarding Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Management.Erich W. Schienke, Seth D. Baum, Nancy Tuana, Kenneth J. Davis & Klaus Keller - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):503-523.details
|
|
Computational Philosophy.Patrick Grim & Daniel Singer - 2024 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Gender studies as a multi-centred field? Centres and peripheries in academic gender research.Veronika Wöhrer - 2016 - Feminist Theory 17 (3):323-343.details
|
|
'Our Feet are Mired In the Same Soil': Deepening Democracy with the Political Virtue of Sympathetic Inquiry.Jennifer Lynn Kiefer Fenton - 2019 - Dissertation, Marquette Universitydetails
|
|
Towards a socially constructed and objective concept of mental disorder.Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):9401-9426.details
|
|
Force and Objectivity: On Impact, Form, and Receptivity to Nature in Science and Art.Eli Lichtenstein - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Michigandetails
|
|
A Multi-Dimensional Pluralist Response to the DSM-Controversies.Anke Bueter - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (2):316-343.details
|
|
The harms of ignoring the social nature of science.Sara Weaver - 2019 - Synthese 196 (1):355-375.details
|
|
Science, Respect for Nature, and Human Well-Being: Democratic Values and the Responsibilities of Scientists Today.Hugh Lacey - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):51-67.details
|
|
Mission Completed? Changing Visibility of Women’s Colleges in England and Japan and Their Roles in Promoting Gender Equality in Science.Naonori Kodate, Kashiko Kodate & Takako Kodate - 2010 - Minerva 48 (3):309-330.details
|
|
A roadmap to explanatory pluralism: introduction to the topical collection The Biology of Behaviour.Eric Muszynski & Christophe Malaterre - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):1777-1789.details
|
|
Who Knows? Reflexivity in Feminist Standpoint Theory and Bourdieu.Paige L. Sweet - 2020 - Gender and Society 34 (6):922-950.details
|
|
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics.Sara Giordano - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (3):401-430.details
|
|
X—Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of Science.Nancy Cartwright - 2021 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 120 (3):237-252.details
|
|
A failure to communicate: the fact-value divide and the Putnam-Dasgupta debate.Huei-Chun Su & David Colander - 2013 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):1.details
|
|
Medical knowledge in a social world: Introduction to the special issue.Bennett Holman, Sven Bernecker & Luciana Garbayo - 2019 - Synthese 196 (11):4351-4361.details
|
|
On the Suppression of Medical Evidence.Alexander Christian - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (3):395-418.details
|
|
(1 other version)Notes on economics imperialism and norms of scientific inquiry.Uskali Mäki - 2021 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 21 (1):95-127.details
|
|
Rational Disagreements in Phylogenetics.Fabrizzio Guerrero Mc Manus - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):99-127.details
|
|
Smaller is Better? Learning an Ethos and Worldview in Nanoengineering Education.Emily York - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (2):109-122.details
|
|
Socially Responsible Science and the Unity of Values.Miriam Solomon - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (3):331-338.details
|
|
Object-oriented philosophy and the comprehension of scientific realities.Paloma García Díaz - 2011 - Athenea Digital 11 (1):225-238.details
|
|
Objectivity in contexts: withholding epistemic judgement as a strategy for mitigating collective bias.Inkeri Koskinen - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):211-225.details
|
|
Pluralization through epistemic competition: scientific change in times of data-intensive biology.Fridolin Gross, Nina Kranke & Robert Meunier - 2019 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41 (1):1.details
|
|
Students’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Perspectives from Canadian and Korean Middle School Students.Hyeran Park, Wendy Nielsen & Earl Woodruff - 2014 - Science & Education 23 (5):1169-1196.details
|
|
Argumentation Theory and the Recent Philosophy of Science.William Rehg - unknowndetails
|
|
Taking Up Thagard’s Challenge: A Formal Model of Conceptual Revision.Sena Bozdag & Matteo De Benedetto - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (4):791-824.details
|
|