- Enthymematic Arguments.David Hitchcock - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (2).details
|
|
Problems in Testing Informal Logic Critical Thinking Reasoning Ability.Robert H. Ennis - 1984 - Informal Logic 6 (1).details
|
|
Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach.Robert H. Ennis - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (2).details
|
|
Defining the Term "Argument".P. Chittleborough & M. E. Newman - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (3).details
|
|
Unstated premises.Michael B. Burke - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (2).details
|
|
Inference Claims.David Hitchcock - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (3):191-229.details
|
|
The Paradoxical Associated Conditional of Enthymemes.Gilbert Plumer - 2000 - In Christopher W. Tindale, Hans V. Hansen & Elmar Sveda (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.details
|
|
A verisimilitudinarian analysis of the Linda paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.details
|
|
Is Critical Thinking Culturally Biased?Robert H. Ennis - 1998 - Teaching Philosophy 21 (1):15-33.details
|
|
Common Knowledge and Argumentation Schemes .Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2005 - Studies in Communication Sciences 5 (2):1-22.details
|
|
An Automated System for Argument Invention in Law Using Argumentation and Heuristic Search Procedures.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Ratio Juris 18 (4):434-463.details
|
|
Carroll’s Regress Times Three.Gilbert Plumer - 2023 - Acta Analytica 38 (4):551-571.details
|
|
Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter.Fabrizio Macagno - 2022 - Journal of Pragmatics 191:67-82.details
|
|
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.David Hitchcock & Bart Verheij (eds.) - 2006 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Informal Logic’s Infinite Regress: Inference Through a Looking-Glass.Gilbert Edward Plumer - 2018 - In Steve Oswald (ed.), Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017. pp. 365-377.details
|
|
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):469-498.details
|
|
Informal Logic: A 'Canadian' Approach to Argument.Federico Puppo (ed.) - 2019 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.details
|
|
The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction.Fábio Perin Shecaira - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (4):471-501.details
|
|
Finding enthymemes in real-world texts: A feasibility study.Olesya Razuvayevskaya & Simone Teufel - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (2):113-129.details
|
|
Is the Enthymeme a Syllogism?James Fredal - 2018 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 51 (1):24-49.details
|
|
Assessing the epistemic quality of democratic decision-making in terms of adequate support for conclusions.Henrik Friberg-Fernros & Johan Karlsson Schaffer - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):251-265.details
|
|
Henrique J. Ribeiro (ed): Inside Arguments. Logic and the Study of Argumentation: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2012, vii + 405 pp. [REVIEW]Sara Greco Morasso - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):453-458.details
|
|
Presumptions, Assumptions, and Presuppositions of Ordinary Arguments.Gilbert Plumer - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (3):469-484.details
|
|
Don’t worry, be gappy! On the unproblematic gappiness of alleged fallacies.Fabio Paglieri - unknowndetails
|
|
The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory.D. Walton - 2008 - Journal of Applied Logic 6 (3):361-379.details
|
|
Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision.Robert H. Ennis - 2018 - Topoi 37 (1):165-184.details
|
|
Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes.D. Walton & C. A. Reed - 2005 - Synthese 145 (3):339-370.details
|
|
On deductivism : a critical survey of deductivism in informal logic.Paul L. Simard Smith - unknowndetails
|
|
So.David Hitchcock - unknowndetails
|
|
Commentary on Hitchcock.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - unknowndetails
|
|
Mutual reconstruction of arguments in dialogue.Niels Moeller Nielsen - unknowndetails
|
|
Teaching the Pursuit of Assumptions.Peter Gardner & Stephen Johnson - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 49 (4):557-570.details
|
|
No more charity, please! Enthymematic parsimony and the pitfall of benevolence.Fabio Paglieri - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. OSSA. pp. 1--26.details
|
|
In just what sense should I be critical? An exploration into the notion of 'assumption'and some implications for assessment.Andrés Mejía - 2009 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (4):351-367.details
|
|
Interpreting Arguments.Jonathan Berg - 1987 - Informal Logic 9 (1).details
|
|
John Nolt's Inductive Reasoning Test.Howard Kahane - 1984 - Informal Logic 6 (3).details
|
|
Applying Soundness Standards to Qualified Reasoning.Robert H. Ennis - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):23-39.details
|
|
Three Recalcitrant Problems of Argument Identification.Michael E. Malone - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (3):237-261.details
|
|
What is an Assumption?Steve Fuller - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (2).details
|
|
The Case of the Missing Premise.Don S. Levi - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (1).details
|
|
Are "Gap-Fillers" Missing Premisses?Wayne Grennan - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3).details
|
|
Critical Thinking, A Deflated Defense: A Critical Study of John E. McPeck's Teaching Critical Thinking: Dialogue and Dialectic.Jonathan E. Adler - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).details
|
|
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.Bart Verheij - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):347-371.details
|
|
Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision.Georg Brun & Hans Rott - 2013 - Synthese 190 (18):4041-4063.details
|
|
In Just What Sense Should I be Critical? An Exploration into the Notion of ‘Assumption’ and Some Implications for Assessment.Andrés Mejía D. - 2009 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (4):351-367.details
|
|
Does the Traditional Treatment of Enthymemes Rest on a Mistake?David Hitchcock - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):15-37.details
|
|
The structure of argumentation in health product messages.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (3):179-198.details
|
|