- Diagnosing Misattribution of Commitments: A Normative and Pragmatic Model of for Assessing Straw Man.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2019 - In Alessandro Capone, Marco Carapezza & Franco Lo Piparo (eds.), Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications. Springer Verlag. pp. 111-136.details
|
|
Ignorance, misconceptions and critical thinking.Sara Dellantonio & Luigi Pastore - 2020 - Synthese 198 (8):7473-7501.details
|
|
Deduction by children and animals: Does it follow the Johnson-Laird & Byrne model?Hank Davis - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):344-344.details
|
|
Computer-Aided Argument Mapping and the Teaching of Critical Thinking (Part 1).Martin Davies - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):15-30.details
|
|
Tractability considerations in deduction.James M. Crawford - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):343-343.details
|
|
Some difficulties about deduction.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):341-342.details
|
|
Mental models and nonmonotonic reasoning.Nick Chater - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):340-341.details
|
|
Argumentation and the problem of agreement.John Casey & Scott F. Aikin - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-23.details
|
|
“Semantic procedure” is an oxymoron.Alan Bundy - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):339-340.details
|
|
Mental models cannot exclude mental logic and make little sense without it.Martin D. S. Braine - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):338-339.details
|
|
Johnson and the Soundness Doctrine.David Botting - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):501-525.details
|
|
Subordinating Truth – Is Acceptability Acceptable?George Boger - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (2):187-238.details
|
|
Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument.George Boger - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):149-174.details
|
|
Probative Norms for Multimodal Visual Arguments.J. Anthony Blair - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):217-233.details
|
|
Meta-argumentation, An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory.J. Anthony Blair - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (2):219-239.details
|
|
Informal Logic’s Influence on Philosophy Instruction.J. Anthony Blair - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):259-286.details
|
|
A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler.J. Anthony Blair - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):109-128.details
|
|
Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.J. Anthony Blair - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.details
|
|
Evaluating Dialectical Structures.Gregor Betz - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):283-312.details
|
|
Analogies and Other Minds.Bryan Benham - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):198-214.details
|
|
A face is not just like a hand: Pace Barker.Françoise Baylis - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):30 – 32.details
|
|
Toward a developmental theory of mental models.Bruno G. Bara - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):336-336.details
|
|
Everyday reasoning and logical inference.Jon Barwise - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):337-338.details
|
|
Deduction as an example of thinking.Jonathan Baron - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):336-337.details
|
|
Getting down to cases.Kent Bach - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):334-336.details
|
|
Les coordonnées de la philosophie pratique : le « sens en usage » de l’expression dans cinq articles sur Wikipédia.Alain Létourneau - 2020 - In André Lacroix (ed.), La philosophie pratique. Les Presses de l’Université de Laval. pp. 17-42.details
|
|
Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere.Robert Asen - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (2):117-137.details
|
|
Mental models and tableau logic.Avery D. Andrews - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):334-334.details
|
|
Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry.Corina Andone - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):45-60.details
|
|
Proposal of a Classification of Analogies.David Alvargonzález - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (1):109-137.details
|
|
Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.details
|
|
Are Conductive Arguments Possible?Jonathan Adler - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.details
|
|
Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments.J. E. Adler - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):83-92.details
|
|
La philosophie pratique.André Lacroix (ed.) - 2020 - Les Presses de l’Université de Laval.details
|
|
Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Is Argument From Cause to Effect Really Defeasible?Tomáš Kollárik - 2023 - Filosofie Dnes 15 (1):23-51.details
|
|
Cultural attitudes: in contexts of argumentation and explanation. [REVIEW] Shi-Xu - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (2):371-398.details
|
|
Argumentieren im Philosophie- und Ethikunterricht. Grundfragen, Anwendungen, Grenzen.David Löwenstein, Donata Romizi & Jonas Pfister (eds.) - 2023 - Göttingen: V&R Unipress.details
|
|
Epistemic Thought Experiments and Intuitions.Manhal Hamdo - 2023 - Springer Verlag.details
|
|
"Conductive" argumentation in the UK fracking debate.Isabela Fairclough - 2017 - In Fairclough Isabela (ed.), Studies in Logic and Argumentation. College Publications.details
|
|
Argumentieren lernen. Aufgaben für den Philosophie- und Ethikunterricht.Henning Franzen, Anne Burkard & David Löwenstein (eds.) - 2023 - Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.John Anthony Blair - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.details
|
|
Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing about Doing.Christian Kock (ed.) - 2017 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law.Frank Zenker - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (1):62-91.details
|
|
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):469-498.details
|
|
Look before you leap.Michael Wreen - 2009 - Social Epistemology 23 (2):89 – 104.details
|
|