- Argument from Expert Opinion as Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System.Douglas Walton David M. Godden - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (3):261-286.details
|
|
Mutual Recognition and Rational Justification in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2009 - Dialogue 48 (4):753-99.details
|
|
Argument from Expert Opinion as Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System.David M. Godden & Douglas Walton - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (3):261-286.details
|
|
Truths that Science Cannot Touch.René van Woudenberg - 2011 - Philosophia Reformata 76 (2):169-186.details
|
|
Science and the Ethics of Belief. An Examination of Philipse’s ‘Rule R’.René van Woudenberg & Joelle Rothuizen-van der Steen - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (2):349-362.details
|
|
From pragmatism to perfectionism: Cheryl Misak's epistemic deliberativism.Robert B. Talisse - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (3):387-406.details
|
|
Lyotard, postmodernism and science education: A rejoinder to Zembylas.Roland M. Schulz - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (6):633–656.details
|
|
Lyotard, Postmodernism and Science Education: A Rejoinder To Zembylas.Roland M. Schulz - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (6):633-656.details
|
|
Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.Uwe Peters - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1061-1081.details
|
|
Is science like a crossword puzzle? Foundherentist conceptions of scientific warrant.Rik Peels - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):82-101.details
|
|
Braucht die Theoretische Physik den Religiösen Glauben? Neo-Scholastik und Positivismus in der Dritten RepublikLa Physique Théorique A-T-Elle Besoin des Croyances Religieuses? Néo-Scolastique et Postivisme Sous la IIIe RépubliqueIs theoretical physics in need of religious faith? Neo-scholasticism and positivism in the Third RepublicLa Física Teórica Necesita las Creencias Religiosas? Neoescolástica y Positivismo Bajo la III República.Matthias Neuber - 2013 - Revue de Synthèse 134 (2):221-247.details
|
|
Belief, Knowledge and Understanding.Frederik Moreira-dos-Santos & Charbel N. El-Hani - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (3-4):215-245.details
|
|
What’s so bad about scientism?Moti Mizrahi - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (4):351-367.details
|
|
Philosopher of precision and soul: Introducing Walker Percy.Leslie Marsh - 2016 - Zygon 51 (4):983-998.details
|
|
Methodological naturalism and the truth seeking objection.Erkki Vesa Rope Kojonen - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81 (3):335-355.details
|
|
Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing.Michael H. G. Hoffmann - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):365-397.details
|
|
The case of the disappearing dilemma: Herbert Blumer on sociological method.Martyn Hammersley - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (5):70-90.details
|
|
Philosophy's contribution to social science research on education.Martyn Hammersley - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (2):273–286.details
|
|
Romanticism and Romantic Science: Their Contribution to Science Education.Yannis Hadzigeorgiou & Roland Schulz - 2014 - Science & Education 23 (10):1963-2006.details
|
|
On Logic in the Law: "Something, but not All".Susan Haack - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):1-31.details
|
|
Fallibilism, Objectivity, and the New Cynicism.Susan Haack - 2004 - Episteme 1 (1):35-48.details
|
|
Scientism and Scientific Thinking.Renia Gasparatou - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (7-9):799-812.details
|
|
What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience.Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (8):1177-1198.details
|
|
Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience.Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry & Massimo Pigliucci - 2016 - Theoria 83 (1):78-97.details
|
|
Islamic modernity and the challenges for secular liberalism.Stefaan Blancke - 2018 - Zygon 53 (1):274-287.details
|
|
The road is made by walking: An introduction.Pat Bennett & John A. Teske - 2017 - Zygon 52 (3):764-776.details
|
|
“Things Counter, Original, Spare, Strange”: Developing a Postfoundational Transversal Model for Science/Religion Dialogue.Pat Bennett - 2019 - Zygon 54 (1):107-128.details
|
|
Scientism and Scientific Imperialism.Jonathan Beale - 2019 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (1):73-102.details
|
|
La Ciencia entre el Objetivismo y el Construccionismo.Juan Carlos Aguirre & Luis Guillermo Jaramillo - 2010 - Cinta de Moebio 38:72-90.details
|
|
A Framework for Understanding Wishful Thinking.Daniel Hicks & Kevin Elliott - manuscriptdetails
|
|
Causality in Cancer Research: a Journey Through Models in Molecular Epidemiology and their Philosophical Interpretation.Paolo Vineis, Phyllis Illari & Federica Russo - 2017 - Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 14 (7):1-8.details
|
|
What Does it Mean that PRIMES is in P: Popularization and Distortion Revisited.Boaz Miller - 2009 - Social Studies of Science 39 (2):257-288.details
|
|
Vérité, conversation et l’herméneutique de l’annihilation. Susan Haack vs. Richard Rorty.Gerard Stan - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (1):209-230.details
|
|
Loki's wager and Laudan's error: on genuine and territorial demarcation.Maarten Boudry - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 79--98.details
|
|
Beyond the Hoax : A Response to Emily A. Schultz.Alan Sokal - unknowndetails
|
|
B. F. Skinner's Other Positivistic Book: "Walden Two".Roy A. Moxley - 2006 - Behavior and Philosophy 34:19 - 37.details
|
|