- Les “règles de la discussion légitime” dans la logique de Port-Royal.Alessandro Giuliani - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (3):263-273.details
|
|
Proof and Dialogue in Aristotle.Roderic A. Girle - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):289-316.details
|
|
Dialogue and the teaching of reasoning.Roderic A. Girle - 1991 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 23 (1):45–55.details
|
|
Resolving questions, I.Jonathan Ginzburg - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (5):459 - 527.details
|
|
Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.Michael A. Gilbert - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (3):245-264.details
|
|
Proof and implication in mill's philosophy of logic.Geoffrey Scarre - 1984 - History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):19-37.details
|
|
Argumentation, dialogue and the kathāvatthu.Jonardon Ganeri - 2001 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 (4):485-493.details
|
|
Resource-origins of Nonmonotonicity.Dov Gabbay & John Woods - 2008 - Studia Logica 88 (1):85-112.details
|
|
Descriptive vs Revisionary Social Epistemology: The Former as Seen by the Latter.Steve Fuller - 2004 - Episteme 1 (1):23-34.details
|
|
Logical fallacies as informational shortcuts.Luciano Floridi - 2009 - Synthese 167 (2):317 - 325.details
|
|
Does the Consequence Argument Beg the Question?John Martin Fischer & Garrett Pendergraft - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):575-595.details
|
|
Can any statements about human behavior be empirically validated?Baruch Fischoff - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):336-337.details
|
|
Arguments, Meta-arguments, and Metadialogues: A Reconstruction of Krabbe, Govier, and Woods. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (3):253-268.details
|
|
El uso de falacias en la comunicación absurda.Jesús Portillo Fernández - 2018 - Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura 28 (2):443-458.details
|
|
Abstract models for dialogue protocols.Raquel Fernández & Ulle Endriss - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):121-140.details
|
|
On defining rationality unreasonably.J. St B. T. Evans & P. Pollard - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):335-336.details
|
|
Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.Benjamin Eva & Stephan Hartmann - 2018 - Psychological Review 125 (5):806-821.details
|
|
Rationality and the sanctity of competence.Hillel J. Einhorn & Robin M. Hogarth - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):334-335.details
|
|
Epistemic Coverage and Argument Closure.Catherine E. Hundleby - 2020 - Topoi 40 (5):1051-1062.details
|
|
Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.details
|
|
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem. [REVIEW]Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.details
|
|
The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion.Frans H. Eemeren - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.details
|
|
Post hoc ergo propter hoc: methodological limits of performance-oriented studies in CSR.Marian Eabrasu - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (3):S11-S23.details
|
|
Antecedents and consequents.V. H. Dudman - 1986 - Theoria 52 (3):168-199.details
|
|
The normative structure of case study argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 1993 - Metaphilosophy 24 (3):207-226.details
|
|
The persistence of cognitive illusions.Persi Diaconis & David Freedman - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):333-334.details
|
|
The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning.Michael Waldmann (ed.) - 2017 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The Rise of Informal Logic: Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning, and Politics.Ralph Henry Johnson - 1996 - Newport, VA, USA: Vale Press. Edited by J. Anthony Blair, Trudy Govier, Leo Groarke, John Hoaglund & Christopher W. Tindale.details
|
|
Understanding misunderstandings. Presuppositions and presumptions in doctor-patient chronic care consultations.Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi - 2017 - Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (14):49–75.details
|
|
Science, politics, and morality: scientific uncertainty and decision making.René von Schomberg (ed.) - 1993 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.details
|
|
The boundaries of lying: Casuistry and the pragmatic dimension of interpretation.Fabrizio Macagno & Giovanni Damele - 2023 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:19–58.details
|
|
Etapas/ Fases de la argumentación.María G. Navarro - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos Gómez (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. pp. 243--244.details
|
|
Informal Logic.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Logic in Classical Indian Philosophy.Brendan Gillon - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Commentary on Blair.David Hitchcock - unknowndetails
|
|
Comments on Floris Roelofsen’s Questions and Indeterminate Reference.David Hitchcock - 2021 - In Moritz Cordes (ed.), Asking and Answering: Rivalling Approaches to Interrogative Methods. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto. pp. 253–258.details
|
|
Economic Reasoning and Fallacy of Composition: Pursuing a Woods-Walton Thesis.A. Finocchiaro Maurice - unknowndetails
|
|
A verisimilitudinarian analysis of the Linda paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.details
|
|
Kant's Idea of the Highest Good: Its Ethical Importance for the Overcoming of Evil and to Answer the 'Whither' Question.Alonso Villarán - 2011 - Proceedings of the Southeast Philosophy Congress.details
|
|
Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy: Enrichments and Their Use for Manipulating Commitments.Fabrizio Macagno - 2022 - Langages 1 (13).details
|
|
A dialectical approach to presupposition.Fabrizio Macagno - 2018 - Intercultural Pragmatics 15 (2):291-313.details
|
|
uncommon ground.Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone - 2016 - Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (13):151–180.details
|
|
The Semantics and Pragmatics of Argumentation.Carlotta Pavese - forthcoming - In Daniel Altshuler (ed.), Linguistics meets philosophy. Cambridge:details
|
|
On the Impact of Fallacy-based Schemata and Framing Techniques in Persuasive Technologies.Antonio Lieto & Vernero Fabiana - 2020 - Cognititar Workshop @ECAI 2020.details
|
|
Confluencias Y Distinciones Entre Las Nociones De Capacidad Y Competencia Argumentativas.Isabel Cristina Michelan de Azevedo - 2019 - ESTUDIOS SOBRE DISCURSO Y ARGUMENTACIÓN.details
|
|
Dialogue Types, Argumentation Schemes, and Mathematical Practice: Douglas Walton and Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1):159-182.details
|
|
The Diversity of Cognitive Processes in a Dialogue.Katarzyna Budzyńska Olena Yaskorska - 2016 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 28:57-94.details
|
|
Just Following the Rules: Collapse / Incoherence Problems in Ethics, Epistemology, and Argumentation Theory.Patrick Bondy - 2020 - In J. Anthony Blair & Christopher Tindale (eds.), Rigour and Reason: Essays in Honour of Hans Vilhelm Hansen. Windsor, ON, Canada: pp. 172-202.details
|
|