Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Creating Carnists.Rachel Fredericks & Jeremy Fischer - 2024 - Philosophers' Imprint 24.
    We argue that individual and institutional caregivers have a defeasible moral duty to provide dependent children with plant-based diets and related education. Notably, our three arguments for this claim do not presuppose any general duty of veganism. Instead, they are grounded in widely shared beliefs about children’s interests and caregivers’ responsibilities, as well as recent empirical research relevant to children’s moral development, autonomy development, and physical health. Together, these arguments constitute a strong cumulative case against inculcating in children the dietary (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Religiosity and Public Reason: The Case of Direct Action Animal Rights Advocacy.J. Hadley - 2017 - Res Publica 23 (3):299-312.
    Recent social science research indicates that animal rights philosophy plays the functional role of a religion in the lives of the most committed animal rights advocates. In this paper, I apply the functional religion thesis to the recent debate over the place of direct action animal rights advocacy in democratic theory. I outline the usefulness of the functional religion thesis and explain its implications for theorists that call for deliberative theories to be more inclusive of coercive forms of activism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups.Qirui Tian, Qingyang Zheng & Shouxin Li - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark