Creating Carnists

Philosophers' Imprint (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that individual and institutional caregivers have a defeasible moral duty to provide dependent children with plant-based diets and related education. Notably, our three arguments for this claim do not presuppose any general duty of veganism. Instead, they are grounded in widely shared intuitions about children’s interests and caregivers’ responsibilities, as well as recent empirical research relevant to children’s moral development, autonomy development, and physical health. Together, these arguments constitute a strong cumulative case against inculcating in children the dietary practice of regularly eating meat (and other animal products)—a practice we call “carnism.”

Author Profiles

Rachel Fredericks
Independent Scholar
Jeremy Fischer
Independent Scholar

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-04

Downloads
284 (#57,243)

6 months
110 (#37,019)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?