Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A partially non-proper ordinal beyond L.Vincenzo Dimonte - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (9):1309-1321.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • $$I_0$$ and combinatorics at $$\lambda ^+$$.Nam Trang & Xianghui Shi - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (1):131-154.
    We investigate the compatibility of $$I_0$$ with various combinatorial principles at $$\lambda ^+$$, which include the existence of $$\lambda ^+$$ -Aronszajn trees, square principles at $$\lambda $$, the existence of good scales at $$\lambda $$, stationary reflections for subsets of $$\lambda ^{+}$$, diamond principles at $$\lambda $$ and the singular cardinal hypothesis at $$\lambda $$. We also discuss whether these principles can hold in $$L(V_{\lambda +1})$$.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Axiom I 0 and higher degree theory.Xianghui Shi - 2015 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 80 (3):970-1021.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Laver and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):133-164.
    In this commemorative article, the work of Richard Laver is surveyed in its full range and extent.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rank-into-rank hypotheses and the failure of GCH.Vincenzo Dimonte & Sy-David Friedman - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (3-4):351-366.
    In this paper we are concerned about the ways GCH can fail in relation to rank-into-rank hypotheses, i.e., very large cardinals usually denoted by I3, I2, I1 and I0. The main results are a satisfactory analysis of the way the power function can vary on regular cardinals in the presence of rank-into-rank hypotheses and the consistency under I0 of the existence of j:Vλ+1≺Vλ+1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${j : V_{\lambda+1} {\prec} V_{\lambda+1}}$$\end{document} with the failure of GCH (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Generic at.Vincenzo Dimonte - 2018 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 64 (1-2):118-132.
    In this paper we introduce a generic large cardinal akin to, together with the consequences of being such a generic large cardinal. In this case is Jónsson, and in a choiceless inner model many properties hold that are in contrast with pcf theory in.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Inverse limit reflection and the structure of L.Scott S. Cramer - 2015 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 15 (1):1550001.
    We extend the results of Laver on using inverse limits to reflect large cardinals of the form, there exists an elementary embedding Lα → Lα. Using these inverse limit reflection embeddings directly and by broadening the collection of U-representable sets, we prove structural results of L under the assumption that there exists an elementary embedding j : L → L. As a consequence we show the impossibility of a generalized inverse limit X-reflection result for X ⊆ Vλ+1, thus focusing the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations