Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Risk, Double Effect and the Social Benefit Requirement.Robert C. Hughes - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):29-29.
    Many ethicists maintain that medical research on human subjects that presents no prospect of direct medical benefit must have a prospect of social benefit to be ethical. Payment is not the sort of benefit that justifies exposing subjects to risk. Alan Wertheimer has raised a serious challenge to this view, pointing out that in industry, social value is not considered necessary to make dangerous jobs ethical. This article argues that Wertheimer was correct to think that the ethics of hazard pay (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Fifth Face of Fair Subject Selection: Population Grouping.Tomasz Żuradzki - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):41-43.
    The article by MacKay and Saylor (2020) claims that the principle of fair subject selection yields conflicting imperatives (e.g. in the case of pregnant women) and should be understood as “a bundle of four distinct sub-principles” (i.e. fair inclusion, burden sharing, opportunity, distribution of third-party risks), each having conflicting normative recommendations (MacKay and Saylor 2020). The authors also offer guidance as to how we should navigate between subprinciples that may conflict with each other. The problem is a crucial one since (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Context is Needed When Assessing Fair Subject Selection.G. Owen Schaefer - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):20-22.
    Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 20-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Clinical Research Subject Selection During Public Health Disasters: Reconceptualizing Fairness in a Global Ethical Context.Ikeolu O. Afolabi, Stephen O. Sodeke & Michael O. S. Afolabi - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):38-41.
    Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 38-41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Exploitation of Professional “Guinea Pigs” in the Gig Economy: The Difficult Road From Consent to Justice.Roberto Abadie - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):37-39.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 37-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Payment in Challenge Studies: Ethics, Attitudes and a New Payment for Risk Model.Olivia Grimwade, Julian Savulescu, Alberto Giubilini, Justin Oakley, Joshua Osowicki, Andrew J. Pollard & Anne-Marie Nussberger - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):815-826.
    Controlled Human Infection Model research involves the infection of otherwise healthy participants with disease often for the sake of vaccine development. The COVID-19 pandemic has emphasised the urgency of enhancing CHIM research capability and the importance of having clear ethical guidance for their conduct. The payment of CHIM participants is a controversial issue involving stakeholders across ethics, medicine and policymaking with allegations circulating suggesting exploitation, coercion and other violations of ethical principles. There are multiple approaches to payment: reimbursement, wage payment (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive”.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):W8-W11.
    Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2020, Page W8-W11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Decision to Enroll in a Clinical Trial Should Be Unencumbered.Luke Gelinas & Barbara E. Bierer - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (9):23-25.
    Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2020, Page 23-25.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ethically Allocating COVID-19 Drugs Via Pre-Approval Access and Emergency Use Authorization.Jamie Webb, Lesha D. Shah & Holly Fernandez Lynch - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (9):4-17.
    Allocating access to unapproved COVID-19 drugs available via Pre-Approval Access pathways or Emergency Use Authorization raises unique challenges at the intersection of clinical care and research....
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Coercive Offers Without Coercion as Subjection.William R. Smith & Benjamin Rossi - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):64-66.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 64-66.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is Being “Paid to Endure” Compatible With Autonomy? Paid Research Participation and Five (Rather Than Four) Goods of Work.Sven Nyholm & Jilles Smids - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):41-43.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 41-43.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Coercer’s Role in Coercion.Scott A. Anderson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):39-41.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 39-41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Freedom From Subjection to the Will of Others: Study Payments, Labor, and Moral Equality.Alex John London - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):32-34.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 32-34.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Filthy Lucre or Fitting Offer? Understanding Worries About Payments to Research Participants.Holly Fernandez Lynch, Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Emily A. Largent - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):1-4.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 1-4.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Render “Coercion as Subjection” Implausible.Theodore Bania, Glenn Martin & Ilene Wilets - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):58-60.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 58-60.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consent, Threats, and Offers.Maximilian Kiener - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):66-68.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 66-68.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Proposal for Fair Compensation for Research Participants.Emily E. Anderson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):62-64.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 62-64.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Licensing Domination: Foreign Will and Social Benefit.Danielle M. Wenner - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):60-62.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 60-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Coercion as Subjection and the Institutional Review Board.David B. Resnik - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):56-58.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 56-58.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Clinical Ultimatums: Coercion as Subjection.Jennifer S. Blumenthal-Barby, Mollie Gordon, John H. Coverdale & C. Maxwell Shannon - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):54-56.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 54-56.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Research Payment and Its Social Justice Concerns.Jill A. Fisher - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):35-36.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 35-36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Continued Complexities of Paying Research Participants.Christine Grady - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):5-7.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 5-7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations