Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. When Does Nudging Represent Fraudulent Disclosure?Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Neal W. Dickert & Derek Soled - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):63-66.
    In the article “Informed Consent: What Must be Disclosed and What Must be Understood?” Joseph Millum and Danielle Bromwich argue that informed consent requires satisfaction of certain disclosure an...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Utilizing Community Research Committees to Improve the Informed Consent Process.Marc Tunzi, Robert P. Lennon, David Satin & Philip G. Day - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):73-75.
    Millum and Bromwich’s excellent article provides both conceptual and practical rationale for reexamining the fundamentals of the informed consent process for research and clinical interventi...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Varieties of Minimalism about Informed Consent.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):66-68.
    In their latest contribution to a series of important joint papers on informed consent, Joseph Millum and Danielle Bromwich analyze and reject what they call the “standard view” on informed...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Informed Consent, Understanding, and Trust.David B. Resnik - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):61-63.
    Valid Informed consent to medical treatment or research participation has traditionally been viewed as consisting of the following requirements: the person has t...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Why Have Uniform Informed Consent Documents When the Research Volunteers Are So Diverse?Ross E. McKinney - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):59-60.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • More than Conveying Information: Informed Consent as Speech Act.David C. Magnus, Jacob A. Blythe, Jason N. Batten & Bonnie O. Wong - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):1-3.
    In their target article, Millum and Bromwich situate their article against a backdrop of well-documented empirical research demonstrating that many participants have variable and often poor...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Machine learning applications in healthcare and the role of informed consent: Ethical and practical considerations.Giorgia Lorenzini, David Martin Shaw, Laura Arbelaez Ossa & Bernice Simone Elger - forthcoming - Clinical Ethics:147775092210944.
    Informed consent is at the core of the clinical relationship. With the introduction of machine learning in healthcare, the role of informed consent is challenged. This paper addresses the issue of whether patients must be informed about medical ML applications and asked for consent. It aims to expose the discrepancy between ethical and practical considerations, while arguing that this polarization is a false dichotomy: in reality, ethics is applied to specific contexts and situations. Bridging this gap and considering the whole (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Promoting Disclosure and Understanding in Informed Consent: Optimizing the Impact of the Common Rule “Key Information” Requirement.Stephanie A. Kraft, Elliott M. Weiss & Kathryn M. Porter - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):70-72.
    Millum and Bromwich provide a thorough and thoughtful analysis of what is required for sufficient informed consent, offering distinct conceptualizations of the ethical requirements of disclo...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Informed Consent, Error and Suspending Ignorance: Providing Knowledge or Preventing Error?Arnon Keren & Ori Lev - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (2):351-368.
    The standard account of informed consent has recently met serious criticism, focused on the mismatch between its implications and widespread intuitions about the permissibility of conducting research and providing treatment under conditions of partial knowledge. Unlike other critics of the standard account, we suggest an account of the relations between autonomy, ignorance, and valid consent that avoids these implausible implications while maintaining the standard core idea, namely, that the primary purpose of the disclosure requirement of informed consent is to prevent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Informed Consent Conversations: Neither the Beginning nor the End.Liza-Marie Johnson & Barclay R. Rogers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):76-78.
    Informed Consent: What Must Be Disclosed and What Must Be Understood seeks to challenge the “standard view” of consent. It seeks to do so by segregating the “disclosure function” from the “understa...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moral Neuroenhancement for Prisoners of War.Blake Hereth - 2022 - Neuroethics 15 (1):1-20.
    Moral agential neuroenhancement can transform us into better people. However, critics of MB raise four central objections to MANEs use: It destroys moral freedom; it kills one moral agent and replaces them with another, better agent; it carries significant risk of infection and illness; it benefits society but not the enhanced person; and it’s wrong to experiment on nonconsenting persons. Herein, I defend MANE’s use for prisoners of war fighting unjustly. First, the permissibility of killing unjust combatants entails that, in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Grounds of the Disclosure Requirement for Informed Consent.Tom Dougherty - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):68-70.
    In their important and insightful article, Joseph Millum and Danielle Bromwich distinguish two informational requirements for valid consent—the disclosure requirement and the understanding requirem...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Informed Consent: What Must Be Disclosed and What Must Be Understood?”.Danielle Bromwich & Joseph Millum - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):1-5.
    In “Informed Consent: What Must be Disclosed and What Must be Understood?”, we reject a dogma at the heart of research ethics. We demonstrate that the constitutive claim...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark