- Justice in the Distribution of Knowledge.Faik Kurtulmus & Gürol Irzik - 2017 - Episteme 14 (2):129-146.details
|
|
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.details
|
|
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research.Jan De Winter & Laszlo Kosolosky - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774.details
|
|
Open Science, Philosophy and Peer Review.Michael A. Peters - 2014 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (3):215-219.details
|
|
The Moral Terrain of Science.Heather Douglas - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S5):1-19.details
|
|
Epistemic Vices in Public Debate: The Case of New Atheism.Ian James Kidd - 2017 - In Christopher Cotter & Philip Quadrio (eds.), New Atheism's Legacy: Critical Perspectives from Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Springer. pp. 51-68..details
|
|
Science, Ethics and War: A Pacifist’s Perspective.Jeffrey Kovac - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):449-460.details
|
|
The Ethics of Moral Compromise for Stem Cell Research Policy.Zubin Master & G. K. D. Crozier - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (1):50-65.details
|
|
Privatized Biomedical Research, Public Fears, and the Hazards of Government Regulation: Lessons from Stem Cell Research. [REVIEW]David B. Resnick - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (3):273-287.details
|
|
Asia - Pacific Perspectives on Ethics of Science and Technology.Darryl R. J. Macer (ed.) - 2008 - UNESCO Bangkok.details
|
|
Openness versus Secrecy in Scientific Research.David B. Resnik - 2006 - Episteme 2 (3):135-147.details
|
|
Why be my colleague’s keeper? Moral justifications for peer review.Joe Cain - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):531-540.details
|
|
Faultlines in "bioscience ethics": Lessons from the human genome diversity project.Paul Brodwin - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):56 – 57.details
|
|
(1 other version)Research integrity in china: Problems and prospects.Weiqin Zeng & David Resnik - 2010 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (3):164-171.details
|
|
A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.Barbara E. Ribeiro, Robert D. J. Smith & Kate Millar - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):81-103.details
|
|
Big data: New science, new challenges, new dialogical opportunities.Michael Fuller - 2015 - Zygon 50 (3):569-582.details
|
|
Six Challenges for Ethical Conduct in Science.Petteri Niemi - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1007-1025.details
|
|
The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication.Cheryl Lancaster - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):147-167.details
|
|
Gender Issues in Corporate Leadership.Devora Shapiro & Marilea Bramer - 2013 - Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics:1177-1189.details
|
|
Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.details
|
|
Scientific autonomy and public oversight.David B. Resnik - 2008 - Episteme 5 (2):pp. 220-238.details
|
|
Teaching old dogs new tricks: Continuing education in research ethics.Richard R. Sharp - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):55 – 56.details
|
|
Neuroethics, national security and secrecy.David B. Resnik - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):14 – 15.details
|
|
Environmental and Biosafety Research Ethics Committees: Guidelines and Principles for Ethics Reviewers in the South African Context.Maricel Van Rooyen - 2021 - Dissertation, Stellenbosch Universitydetails
|
|
How to conceive of science for the benefit of society: prospects of responsible research and innovation.Martin Carrier - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 19):4749-4768.details
|
|
Experimental Design: Ethics, Integrity and the Scientific Method.Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - In Ron Iphofen (ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. pp. 459-474.details
|
|
Teaching the Philosophical and Worldview Components of Science.Michael R. Matthews - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):697-728.details
|
|
Neutralité scientifique.Marc-Kevin Daoust - 2018 - Encyclopédie Philosophique.details
|
|
Suppression of scientific research: Bahramdipity and nulltiple scientific discoveries.Toby J. Sommer - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):77-104.details
|
|
DNA patents and scientific discovery and innovation: Assessing benefits and risks.David B. Resnik - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):29-62.details
|
|
Financial interests and research bias.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (3):255-285.details
|
|
The Mentor’s Role in Fostering Research Integrity Standards Among New Generations of Researchers: A Review of Empirical Studies. [REVIEW]Daniel Pizzolato & Kris Dierickx - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (3):1-23.details
|
|
The Tollgate Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering: Moving Beyond the Oxford Principles to an Ethically More Robust Approach.Stephen M. Gardiner & Augustin Fragnière - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (2):143-174.details
|
|
Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? [REVIEW]Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):271-282.details
|
|
Moral rules, moral ideals, and use-inspired research.Jeffrey Kovac - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):159-169.details
|
|
An ethics of expertise based on informed consent.Kevin C. Elliott - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):637-661.details
|
|
Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries.Elise Smith, Matthew Hunt & Zubin Master - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):42.details
|
|
Using an ecological ethics framework to make decisions about the relocation of wildlife.Earl D. McCoy & Kristin Berry - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):505-521.details
|
|
Scientific Ethics: A New Approach.Marcello Menapace - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1193-1216.details
|
|
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys.Vanja Pupovac & Daniele Fanelli - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1331-1352.details
|
|
Startup Ethics: Ethically Responsible Conduct of Scientists and Engineers at Theranos.Robert E. McGinn - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (5):1-21.details
|
|
Ethical Issues in Social Science Research Employing Big Data.Mohammad Hosseini, Michał Wieczorek & Bert Gordijn - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (3):1-21.details
|
|
Does Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practices.Anita Borch & Harald Throne-Holst - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-21.details
|
|
Intellectual Freedom and Editorial Responsibilities Within the Context of Controversial Research.David J. Pittenger - 2003 - Ethics and Behavior 13 (2):105-125.details
|
|
Should Internet Researchers Use Ill-Gotten Information?David M. Douglas - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1221-1240.details
|
|
Scientific ethos and ethical dimensions of education.Sergey B. Kulikov - 2022 - International Journal of Ethics Education 7 (2):307-324.details
|
|
Reverence and Ethics in Science.Jeffrey Kovac - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):745-756.details
|
|
The Scientific Judgment-Making Process from a Virtue Ethics Perspective.Thomas Dillern - 2021 - Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (4):501-516.details
|
|
From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection.Karen Santos-D’Amorim, Ting Wang, Brady Lund & Raimundo Nonato Macedo Dos Santos - 2024 - Ethics and Behavior 34 (1):40-57.details
|
|
Predictors of Plagiarism Research Misconduct: A Study of Postgraduate Pharmacy Students in Jordan.Rana Abu Farha, Tareq Mukattash & Wael Al-Delaimy - 2020 - Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (4):541-553.details
|
|