Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Dark Triad and the PID-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits: Accuracy, Confidence and Response Bias in Judgments of Veracity.Benno G. Wissing & Marc-André Reinhard - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:273619.
    The Dark Triad traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy—have been found to be associated with intra- or interpersonal deception production frequency. This cross-sectional study ( N = 207) investigated if the Dark Triad traits are also associated with deception detection accuracy, as implicated by the recent conception of a deception-general ability. To investigate associations between maladaptive personality space and deception, the PID-5 maladaptive personality traits were included to investigate if besides Machiavellianism, Detachment is negatively associated with response bias. Finally, associations between the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Explicit Instructions Increase Cognitive Costs of Deception in Predictable Social Context.Marcel Falkiewicz, Justyna Sarzyńska, Justyna Babula, Iwona Szatkowska, Anna Grabowska & Edward Nęcka - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • If I imagine it, then it happened: The Implicit Truth Value of imaginary representations.Daniella Shidlovski, Yaacov Schul & Ruth Mayo - 2014 - Cognition 133 (3):517-529.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (Social) Metacognition and (Self-)Trust.Kourken Michaelian - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):481-514.
    What entitles you to rely on information received from others? What entitles you to rely on information retrieved from your own memory? Intuitively, you are entitled simply to trust yourself, while you should monitor others for signs of untrustworthiness. This article makes a case for inverting the intuitive view, arguing that metacognitive monitoring of oneself is fundamental to the reliability of memory, while monitoring of others does not play a significant role in ensuring the reliability of testimony.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Lying to the Nazi at the Door: A Thomistic Reframing of the Classic Moral Dilemma.Stewart Clem - 2021 - Journal of Religious Ethics 49 (1):6-32.
    Moral philosophers and theologians have long debated the classic moral dilemma of lying to an intruder in order to save a refugee. This dilemma presents an especially difficult challenge to those who reject consequentialist reasoning. Many contemporary defenders of Thomas Aquinas have argued that lying is never permissible under any circumstances, but none has offered a satisfactory answer to the question of what one ought to do when facing such a dilemma. I argue that there can be no morally satisfying (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Memory‐Based Deception Detection: Extending the Cognitive Signature of Lying From Instructed to Self‐Initiated Cheating.Linda M. Geven, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, Merel Kindt & Bruno Verschuere - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (2):608-631.
    Geven, Ben‐Shakhar, Kindt and Verschuere point out that research on deception detection usually employs instructed cheating. They experimentally demonstrate that participants show slower reaction times for concealed information than for other information, regardless of whether they are explicitly instructed to cheat or whether they can freely choose to cheat or not. Finding this ‘cognitive signature of lying’ with self‐initiated cheating too is argued by the authors to strengthen the external validity of deception detection research. [75].
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Lie Detection Using fNIRS Monitoring of Inhibition-Related Brain Regions Discriminates Infrequent but not Frequent Liars.Fang Li, Huilin Zhu, Jie Xu, Qianqian Gao, Huan Guo, Shijing Wu, Xinge Li & Sailing He - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The evolution of testimony: Receiver vigilance, speaker honesty and the reliability of communication.Kourken Michaelian - 2013 - Episteme 10 (1):37-59.
    Drawing on both empirical evidence and evolutionary considerations, Sperber et al. argue that humans have a suite of evolved mechanisms for . On their view, vigilance plays a crucial role in ensuring the reliability and hence the evolutionary stability of communication. This article responds to their argument for vigilance, drawing on additional empirical evidence (from deception detection research) and evolutionary considerations (from animal signalling research) to defend a more optimistic, quasi-Reidian view of communication. On this alternative view, the lion's share (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The information effect: constructive memory, testimony, and epistemic luck.Kourken Michaelian - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):2429-2456.
    The incorporation of post-event testimonial information into an agent’s memory representation of the event via constructive memory processes gives rise to the misinformation effect, in which the incorporation of inaccurate testimonial information results in the formation of a false memory belief. While psychological research has focussed primarily on the incorporation of inaccurate information, the incorporation of accurate information raises a particularly interesting epistemological question: do the resulting memory beliefs qualify as knowledge? It is intuitively plausible that they do not, for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • When deception becomes easy: the effects of task switching and goal neglect on the truth proportion effect.Bram Van Bockstaele, Christine Wilhelm, Ewout Meijer, Evelyne Debey & Bruno Verschuere - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:151121.
    Lying is typically more cognitively demanding than truth telling. Yet, recent cognitive models of lying propose that lying can be just as easy as truth telling, depending on contextual factors. In line with this idea, research has shown that the cognitive cost of deception decreases when people frequently respond deceptively, while it increases when people rarely respond deceptively (i.e., the truth proportion effect). In the present study, we investigated two possible underlying mechanisms of the truth proportion effect. In Experiment 1 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Suppressing the truth as a mechanism of deception: Delta plots reveal the role of response inhibition in lying.Evelyne Debey, Richard K. Ridderinkhof, Jan De Houwer, Maarten De Schryver & Bruno Verschuere - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 37:148-159.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Lying relies on the truth.Evelyne Debey, Jan De Houwer & Bruno Verschuere - 2014 - Cognition 132 (3):324-334.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Being asked to tell an unpleasant truth about another person activates anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex.Melissa M. Littlefield, Martin J. Dietz, Kasper J. des FitzgeraldKnudsen & James Tonks - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation