Why art is never representation - even when it represents

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The question of whether or not art is essentially a representation of reality has long been a bone of contention among philosophers of art – especially in the major branch of that discipline called the analytic philosophy of art, or analytic aesthetics. This paper argues that art - visual art, literature or music - is never essentially representation. The argument is based on the thinking of André Malraux in "The Voices of Silence".
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-02-08
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
168 ( #26,614 of 53,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #40,858 of 53,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.