Why art is never representation - even when it represents

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The question of whether or not art is essentially a representation of reality has long been a bone of contention among philosophers of art – especially in the major branch of that discipline called the analytic philosophy of art, or analytic aesthetics. This paper argues that art - visual art, literature or music - is never essentially representation. The argument is based on the thinking of André Malraux in "The Voices of Silence".
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-02-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
141 ( #22,866 of 43,942 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #28,990 of 43,942 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.