Is the simulation theory of memory about simulation?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay investigates the notion of simulation and the role it plays in Kourken Michaelian's simulation theory of memory. I argue that the notion is importantly ambiguous and that this ambiguity may threaten some of the central commitments of the theory. To illustrate that, I examine two different conceptions of simulation: a narrow one (simulation as replication) and a broad one (simulation as computational modeling), arguing that the preferred narrow conception is incompatible with the claim that remembering involves the simulation of past episodes. Investigating possible solutions, I suggest that, despite some relatively serious consequences, the theory may be better off subscribing to the broad notion of simulation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANDITS-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-12-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-12-19

Total views
79 ( #49,505 of 2,454,523 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,232 of 2,454,523 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.