Not Rational, But Not Brutely Causal Either: A response to Fodor on concept acquisition

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Jerry Fodor has argued that concept acquisition cannot be a psychological or “rational-causal” process, but can only be a “brute-causal” process of acquisition. This position generates the “doorknob  DOORKNOB” problem: why are concepts typically acquired on the basis of experience with items in their extensions? I argue that Fodor’s taxonomy of causal processes needs supplementation, and characterize a third type: what I call “intelligible-causal processes.” Armed with this new category I present what I regard as a better response than Fodor’s to the doorknob  DOORKNOB problem.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-04-30
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #54,061 of 2,426,010 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #53,582 of 2,426,010 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.