Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing

Written Communication 40 (2):555–585 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Current approaches used in educational research and practice to evaluate the quality of written arguments often rely on structural analysis. In such assessments, credit is awarded for the presence of structural elements of an argument, such as claims, evidence, and rebuttals. In this article, we discuss limitations of such approaches, including the absence of criteria for evaluating the quality of the argument elements. We then present an alternative framework, based on the Rational Force Model (RFM), which originated from the work of a Nordic philosopher Næss. Using an example of an argumentative essay, we demonstrate the potential of the RFM to improve argument analysis by focusing on the acceptability and relevance of argument elements, two criteria widely considered to be fundamental markers of argument strength. We outline possibilities and challenges with using the RFM in educational contexts and conclude by proposing directions for future research.

Author Profiles

Alina Reznitskaya
Montclair State University
Ylva Backman
Lulea University
Viktor Gardelli
Lulea University

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-16

Downloads
179 (#67,310)

6 months
110 (#28,868)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?