From Analysis/Synthesis to Conjecture/Analysis: a Review of Karl Popper’s Influence on Design Methodology in Architecture

Design Studies 23 (3):245-61 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The two principal models of design in methodological circles in architecture—analysis/synthesis and conjecture/analysis—have their roots in philosophy of science, in different conceptions of scientific method. This paper explores the philosophical origins of these models and the reasons for rejecting analysis/synthesis in favour of conjecture/analysis, the latter being derived from Karl Popper’s view of scientific method. I discuss a fundamental problem with Popper’s view, however, and indicate a framework for conjecture/analysis to avoid this problem.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAMFAT
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-04-21

Total views
708 ( #3,441 of 42,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
105 ( #4,506 of 42,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.