On the Right to Justification and Discursive Respect

Dialogue 54 (4):703-726 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rainer Forst’s constructivism argues that a right to justification provides a reasonably non-rejectable foundation of justice. With an exemplary focus on his attempt to ground human rights, I argue that this right cannot provide such a foundation. To accord to others such a right is to include them in the scope of discursive respect. But it is reasonably contested whether we should accord to others equal discursive respect. It follows that Forst’s constructivism cannot ground human rights, or justice, categorically. At best, it can ground them hypothetically. This opens the door wide for ethical foundations of human rights.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BESOTR
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-07-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.Rawls, John & Kelly, Erin

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-07-14

Total views
200 ( #14,925 of 39,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #8,443 of 39,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.