If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis

Bioethics 35 (5):465-472 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Pro-life advocates commonly argue that fetuses have the moral status of persons, and an accompanying right to life, a view most pro-choice advocates deny. A difficulty for this pro-life position has been Judith Jarvis Thomson’s violinist analogy, in which she argues that even if the fetus is a person, abortion is often permissible because a pregnant woman is not obliged to continue to offer her body as life support. Here, we outline the moral theories underlying public health ethics, and examine the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of public health considerations overriding individual rights. We argue that if fetuses are regarded as persons, then abortion is of such prevalence in society that it also constitutes a significant public health crisis. We show that on public health considerations, we are justified in overriding individual rights to bodily autonomy by prohibiting abortion. We conclude that in a society that values public health, abortion can only be tolerated if fetuses are not regarded as persons.
Reprint years
2021
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLAIFA-6
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-03-10
Latest version: 4 (2021-04-03)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-03-10

Total views
166 ( #36,495 of 65,694 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #16,129 of 65,694 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.