Axiomatizing Umwelt Normativity

Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):9-59 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Prompted by the thesis that an organism’s umwelt possesses not just a descriptive dimension, but a normative one as well, some have sought to annex semiotics with ethics. Yet the pronouncements made in this vein have consisted mainly in rehearsing accepted moral intuitions, and have failed to concretely further our knowledge of why or how a creature comes to order objects in its environment in accordance with axiological charges of value or disvalue. For want of a more explicit account, theorists writing on the topic have relied almost exclusively on semiotic insights about perception originally designed as part of a sophisticated refutation of idealism. The end result, which has been a form of direct givenness, has thus been far from convincing. In an effort to bring substance to the right-headed suggestion that values are rooted in the biological and conform to species-specific requirements, we present a novel conception that strives to make explicit the elemental structure underlying umwelt normativity. Building and expanding on the seminal work of Ayn Rand in metaethics, we describe values as an intertwined lattice which takes a creature’s own embodied life as its ultimate standard; and endeavour to show how, from this, all subsequent valuations can in principle be determined.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAAUN
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-11-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 72 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-11-14

Total views
852 ( #2,530 of 41,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
135 ( #3,077 of 41,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.