We, the Professional Sages: Analytic philosophy’s arrogation of argument

Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One claim reiterated with increasing boldness by the “analytic” tradition in philosophy is that what sets it apart from long-time rivals is a shared adherence to proper norms of argumentation. Gradated deviancy from this canon by English-speaking practitioners has therefore raised important questions about who can repair under the banner “professional philosopher.” We will portray as deeply worrisome the idea that argumentation should secure not just conclusions, but disciplinary membership as well.

Author's Profile

Marc Champagne
Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
204 (#40,522)

6 months
13 (#62,876)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?