We, the Professional Sages: Analytic philosophy’s arrogation of argument

Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One claim reiterated with increasing boldness by the “analytic” tradition in philosophy is that what sets it apart from long-time rivals is a shared adherence to proper norms of argumentation. Gradated deviancy from this canon by English-speaking practitioners has therefore raised important questions about who can repair under the banner “professional philosopher.” We will portray as deeply worrisome the idea that argumentation should secure not just conclusions, but disciplinary membership as well.
Reprint years
2009, 2010
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAWTP-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-04-17
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
182 ( #34,237 of 65,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #53,832 of 65,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.