We, the Professional Sages: Analytic philosophy’s arrogation of argument

Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One claim reiterated with increasing boldness by the “analytic” tradition in philosophy is that what sets it apart from long-time rivals is a shared adherence to proper norms of argumentation. Gradated deviancy from this canon by English-speaking practitioners has therefore raised important questions about who can repair under the banner “professional philosopher.” We will portray as deeply worrisome the idea that argumentation should secure not just conclusions, but disciplinary membership as well.
Reprint years
2009, 2010
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAWTP-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-04-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.Price, Huw & McDowell, John

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
77 ( #28,443 of 41,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #32,216 of 41,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.