Aristotle’s Anthropological Machine and Slavery

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):239-262 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Among the most controversial aspects of Aristotle’s philosophy is his endorsement of slavery. Natural slaves are excluded from political citizenship on ontological grounds and are thus constitutively unable to achieve the good life, identified with the collective cultivation of logos in the polis. Aristotle explicitly acknowledges their humanity, yet frequently emphasizes their proximity to animals. It is the latter that makes them purportedly unfit for the polis. I propose to use Agamben’s theory of the anthropological machine to make sense of this enigmatic exclusion and suggest a new conception of the good life and community detached from political rule. Aristotle’s distinction between humans and animals condemns slaves to bare life, but also reveals an opportunity for an inoperative form-of-life.

Author's Profile

Tim Christiaens
Tilburg University

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-08

Downloads
1,090 (#15,951)

6 months
240 (#8,650)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?