Collectives’ and individuals’ obligations: a parity argument

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):38-58 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Individuals have various kinds of obligations: keep promises, don’t cause harm, return benefits received from injustices, be partial to loved ones, help the needy and so on. How does this work for group agents? There are two questions here. The first is whether groups can bear the same kinds of obligations as individuals. The second is whether groups’ pro tanto obligations plug into what they all-things-considered ought to do to the same degree that individuals’ pro tanto obligations plug into what they all-things-considered ought to do. We argue for parity on both counts.

Author Profiles

Holly Lawford-Smith
University of Melbourne
Stephanie Collins
Monash University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-02

Downloads
920 (#20,889)

6 months
144 (#27,189)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?