Aquinas, Geach, and existence

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Aquinas’ theory of being has received a growing amount of attention from contemporary scholars, both from a historic and a philosophical point of view. An important source of this attention is Geach’s seminal Form and Existence. In it, Geach argues that Aquinas subscribes to a tensed notion of existence and a theory of time according to which past and future entities do not exist in act. Subsequent commentators, such as Kenny in his Aquinas on Being, have agreed with Geach on both points. In this paper, I argue that in several passages of his corpus, most notably those in which he is concerned with God’s knowledge of future contingents, Aquinas implicitly subscribes to a theory of being and time according to which: past and future entities are attributed existence in act, there is theoretical need for introducing a tenseless notion of existence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COSAGA
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-08-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-08-02

Total views
148 ( #27,324 of 51,715 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #19,664 of 51,715 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.