La moción divina ante la contingencia y la libertad de las creaturas según santo Tomás y Domingo Báñez

Scripta Fulgentina 30:39-64 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Against an interpretation of Saint Thomas Aquinas’s thought that understands the divine motion of the created will only providing a generic impulse to it, in this article is defended that God moves specifically for every good choice. This motion doesn’t prevent at all the contingency of creatures and neither freedom of choice. Is also shown how Báñez’s thought is quite faithful to Saint Thomas in this and doesn’t intend anything else but simply to make it known and defend it from molinists misinterpretations. That’s why is shown that the divine motion of the will doesnt's make God responsible for sin, especially since that would only be possible if divine causality were not the action of the eternal God, who is outside the created causality.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-01-21
Latest version: 2 (2021-01-22)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #53,369 of 64,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #32,285 of 64,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.